Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA) by country
The Adjusted Wealth Parity Index (WPIA) is calculated by dividing the poorest quintile value for the indicator by the richest quintile value for the indicator. If the resulting value exceeds 1, the ratio is inverted and subtracted from 2. The adjusted wealth parity index is symmetrical around 1 and lies in the...
What the numbers show
Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA) is currently reported for 41 countries. The highest value is 0.8921 WPIA in Hong Kong, China; the lowest is 0.1974 WPIA in Argentina.
The median across all reporting countries is 0.6663 WPIA, and the mean is 0.6227 WPIA.
The gap between the highest and lowest reporting country is a factor of about 5.
Over the past decade 28 countries rose and 12 fell. The largest increase was in Colombia (up 72.9%), and the largest decrease in Slovakia (down 12.1%).
Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at: full country ranking
| # | Country | Latest | Year | 10-year change | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hong Kong, China | 0.8921 WPIA | 2018 | unchanged | flat |
| 2 | Canada | 0.8094 WPIA | 2018 | down 2.9% | falling |
| 3 | Republic of Korea | 0.7994 WPIA | 2018 | down 8.1% | falling |
| 4 | Finland | 0.7993 WPIA | 2018 | down 11.3% | falling |
| 5 | Denmark | 0.7965 WPIA | 2018 | up 8.7% | rising |
| 6 | Norway | 0.784 WPIA | 2018 | up 4.7% | rising |
| 7 | Latvia | 0.7791 WPIA | 2018 | up 15.1% | rising |
| 8 | Netherlands | 0.779 WPIA | 2018 | up 0.3% | falling |
| 9 | Poland | 0.7756 WPIA | 2018 | up 16.5% | rising |
| 10 | Ireland | 0.775 WPIA | 2018 | up 12.6% | flat |
| 11 | Slovenia | 0.7693 WPIA | 2018 | up 13.6% | rising |
| 12 | Iceland | 0.764 WPIA | 2018 | down 4.2% | falling |
| 13 | Russian Federation | 0.7556 WPIA | 2018 | up 22.3% | rising |
| 14 | Sweden | 0.7295 WPIA | 2018 | up 10.8% | falling |
| 15 | Australia | 0.7144 WPIA | 2018 | down 3.0% | falling |
| 16 | New Zealand | 0.7005 WPIA | 2018 | up 0.2% | falling |
| 17 | Austria | 0.7004 WPIA | 2018 | up 11.6% | flat |
| 18 | Croatia | 0.6835 WPIA | 2018 | up 12.8% | rising |
| 19 | Germany | 0.6825 WPIA | 2018 | up 8.5% | rising |
| 20 | Spain | 0.6801 WPIA | 2018 | up 9.1% | rising |
| 21 | Belgium | 0.6663 WPIA | 2018 | up 2.4% | flat |
| 22 | Czechia | 0.6636 WPIA | 2018 | down 0.2% | flat |
| 23 | Portugal | 0.6478 WPIA | 2018 | up 3.7% | rising |
| 24 | Lithuania | 0.6453 WPIA | 2018 | up 8.5% | rising |
| 25 | France | 0.6438 WPIA | 2018 | up 6.5% | falling |
| 26 | United States of America | 0.6156 WPIA | 2018 | down 1.9% | rising |
| 27 | Luxembourg | 0.5948 WPIA | 2018 | down 2.0% | rising |
| 28 | Greece | 0.5728 WPIA | 2018 | down 4.0% | rising |
| 29 | Slovakia | 0.567 WPIA | 2018 | down 12.1% | falling |
| 30 | Thailand | 0.5398 WPIA | 2018 | up 10.1% | flat |
| 31 | Israel | 0.5324 WPIA | 2018 | up 18.3% | rising |
| 32 | Jordan | 0.5228 WPIA | 2018 | up 68.9% | rising |
| 33 | Bulgaria | 0.4482 WPIA | 2018 | up 37.9% | rising |
| 34 | Mexico | 0.4405 WPIA | 2018 | up 15.7% | rising |
| 35 | Romania | 0.4013 WPIA | 2018 | down 10.9% | rising |
| 36 | Uruguay | 0.3883 WPIA | 2018 | up 9.0% | flat |
| 37 | Indonesia | 0.3699 WPIA | 2018 | up 30.4% | flat |
| 38 | Colombia | 0.3367 WPIA | 2018 | up 72.9% | rising |
| 39 | Tunisia | 0.307 WPIA | 2015 | up 32.9% | rising |
| 40 | Brazil | 0.2585 WPIA | 2018 | up 7.2% | rising |
| 41 | Argentina | 0.1974 WPIA | 2018 | down 10.6% | falling |
About this data
The Adjusted Wealth Parity Index (WPIA) is calculated by dividing the poorest quintile value for the indicator by the richest quintile value for the indicator. If the resulting value exceeds 1, the ratio is inverted and subtracted from 2. The adjusted wealth parity index is symmetrical around 1 and lies in the range 0-2. An adjusted WPI equal to 1 indicates parity between the richest and poorest quintiles. In general, a value less than 1 indicates disparity in favor of the richest quintile and a value greater than 1 indicates disparity in favor of the poorest quintile. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute for Statistics: http://uis.unesco.org/