Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at in Australia
Australia: Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at was 0.7144 WPIA in 2018. ▼ Falling
Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at in Australia, 2000–2018
Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Measured in WPIA.
Analysis
The most recent figure for proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at in Australia is 0.7144 WPIA, measured in 2018.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.8% on the previous year and down 3.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at in Australia peaked at 0.8103 WPIA in 2000 and was at its lowest, 0.6992 WPIA, in 2012.
That places Australia 15th out of 41 countries with data for 2018, putting it in the middle of the range.
Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at in Australia, year by year
| Year | WPIA | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 0.8103 WPIA | — |
| 2003 | 0.7567 WPIA | -6.6% |
| 2006 | 0.7864 WPIA | +3.9% |
| 2009 | 0.7363 WPIA | -6.4% |
| 2012 | 0.6992 WPIA | -5.0% |
| 2015 | 0.7089 WPIA | +1.4% |
| 2018 | 0.7144 WPIA | +0.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.7724 WPIA | 0.7363 WPIA | 0.8103 WPIA | 4 |
| 2010s | 0.7075 WPIA | 0.6992 WPIA | 0.7144 WPIA | 3 |
Countries ranked near Australia
More reference data data for Australia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.21 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 28.02 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 38.41 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.55 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 38.41 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.07 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 6.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 118.71 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 170.29 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 13.9 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at in Australia?
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at in Australia was 0.7144 WPIA in 2018, according to UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
- What is the highest proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at recorded in Australia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.8103 WPIA in 2000.
- What is the lowest proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at recorded in Australia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.6992 WPIA in 2012.
- How does Australia rank for proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at?
- Australia ranks 15th out of 41 countries with data for 2018.
- Is proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at rising or falling in Australia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 3.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Australia data come from?
- The figures come from UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as part of Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Adjusted Wealth Parity Index (WPIA) is calculated by dividing the poorest quintile value for the indicator by the richest quintile value for the indicator. If the resulting value exceeds 1, the ratio is inverted and subtracted from 2. The adjusted wealth parity index is symmetrical around 1 and lies in the range 0-2. An adjusted WPI equal to 1 indicates parity between the richest and poorest quintiles. In general, a value less than 1 indicates disparity in favor of the richest quintile and a value greater than 1 indicates disparity in favor of the poorest quintile. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute for Statistics: http://uis.unesco.org/