Openness of Executive Recruitment Score in South Korea
South Korea: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score was 4 in 2018. ▲ Rising
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score in South Korea, 1948–2018
Source: Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2018, openness of executive recruitment score in South Korea stood at 4. That is the highest value across all 70 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, openness of executive recruitment score in South Korea peaked at 4 in 1948 and was at its lowest, 0, in 1961.
South Korea ranks 1st of 167 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 70 years of available data.
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score in South Korea, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1948 | 4 | — |
| 1949 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 1962 | 0 | — |
| 1963 | 4 | — |
| 1964 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 4 | +0.0% |
South Korea compared with similar countries
- South Korea's 4 is above the median for high income countries, which is 4, 1.0× the median. (50 countries reporting)
- South Korea's 4 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 4, 1.0× the median. (20 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 |
| 1950s | 4 | 4 | 4 | 10 |
| 1960s | 3.2 | 0 | 4 | 10 |
| 1970s | 4 | 4 | 4 | 10 |
| 1980s | 4 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
| 1990s | 4 | 4 | 4 | 10 |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 4 | 10 |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
Countries ranked near South Korea
- 1 Afghanistan 4 compare
- 1 Albania 4 compare
- 1 Angola 4 compare
- 1 Argentina 4 compare
- 1 Armenia 4 compare
- 1 Australia 4 compare
- 1 Austria 4 compare
- 1 Azerbaijan 4 compare
- 1 Bangladesh 4 compare
- 1 Belarus 4 compare
- 1 Belgium 4 compare
- 1 Benin 4 compare
- 1 Bolivia 4 compare
- 1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 4 compare
- 1 Botswana 4 compare
- 1 Brazil 4 compare
- 1 Bulgaria 4 compare
- 1 Burkina Faso 4 compare
- 1 Burundi 4 compare
- 1 Canada 4 compare
- 1 Cape Verde 4 compare
- 1 Central African Republic 4 compare
- 1 Chile 4 compare
- 1 China 4 compare
- 1 Colombia 4 compare
- 1 Costa Rica 4 compare
- 1 Cote d'Ivoire 4 compare
- 1 Croatia 4 compare
- 1 Cuba 4 compare
- 1 Cyprus 4 compare
- 1 Czechia 4 compare
- 1 Democratic Republic of Congo 4 compare
- 1 Denmark 4 compare
- 1 Djibouti 4 compare
- 1 Dominican Republic 4 compare
- 1 East Timor 4 compare
- 1 Ecuador 4 compare
- 1 El Salvador 4 compare
- 1 Eritrea 4 compare
- 1 Estonia 4 compare
- 1 Ethiopia 4 compare
- 1 Finland 4 compare
- 1 France 4 compare
- 1 Gabon 4 compare
- 1 Gambia 4 compare
- 1 Georgia 4 compare
- 1 Germany 4 compare
- 1 Ghana 4 compare
- 1 Greece 4 compare
- 1 Guatemala 4 compare
- 1 Guinea 4 compare
- 1 Guinea-Bissau 4 compare
- 1 Guyana 4 compare
- 1 Haiti 4 compare
- 1 Honduras 4 compare
- 1 Hungary 4 compare
- 1 India 4 compare
- 1 Indonesia 4 compare
- 1 Iran 4 compare
- 1 Iraq 4 compare
- 1 Ireland 4 compare
- 1 Israel 4 compare
- 1 Italy 4 compare
- 1 Jamaica 4 compare
- 1 Japan 4 compare
- 1 Kazakhstan 4 compare
- 1 Kenya 4 compare
- 1 Kyrgyzstan 4 compare
- 1 Laos 4 compare
- 1 Latvia 4 compare
- 1 Lebanon 4 compare
- 1 Lesotho 4 compare
- 1 Liberia 4 compare
- 1 Lithuania 4 compare
- 1 Luxembourg 4 compare
- 1 Madagascar 4 compare
- 1 Malawi 4 compare
- 1 Malaysia 4 compare
- 1 Mali 4 compare
- 1 Mauritius 4 compare
- 1 Mexico 4 compare
- 1 Moldova 4 compare
- 1 Mongolia 4 compare
- 1 Montenegro 4 compare
- 1 Mozambique 4 compare
- 1 Myanmar 4 compare
- 1 Namibia 4 compare
- 1 Nepal 4 compare
- 1 Netherlands 4 compare
- 1 New Zealand 4 compare
- 1 Nicaragua 4 compare
- 1 Niger 4 compare
- 1 Nigeria 4 compare
- 1 North Macedonia 4 compare
- 1 Norway 4 compare
- 1 Pakistan 4 compare
- 1 Panama 4 compare
- 1 Papua New Guinea 4 compare
- 1 Paraguay 4 compare
- 1 Peru 4 compare
- 1 Philippines 4 compare
- 1 Poland 4 compare
- 1 Portugal 4 compare
- 1 Romania 4 compare
- 1 Russia 4 compare
- 1 Senegal 4 compare
- 1 Serbia 4 compare
- 1 Sierra Leone 4 compare
- 1 Singapore 4 compare
- 1 Slovakia 4 compare
- 1 Slovenia 4 compare
- 1 Solomon Islands 4 compare
- 1 Somalia 4 compare
- 1 South Africa 4 compare
- 1 Spain 4 compare
- 1 Sri Lanka 4 compare
- 1 Suriname 4 compare
- 1 Sweden 4 compare
- 1 Switzerland 4 compare
- 1 Syria 4 compare
- 1 Taiwan 4 compare
- 1 Tajikistan 4 compare
- 1 Tanzania 4 compare
- 1 Togo 4 compare
- 1 Trinidad and Tobago 4 compare
- 1 Tunisia 4 compare
- 1 Turkmenistan 4 compare
- 1 USSR 4 compare
- 1 Ukraine 4 compare
- 1 United Kingdom 4 compare
- 1 United States 4 compare
- 1 Uruguay 4 compare
- 1 Uzbekistan 4 compare
- 1 Vatican 4
- 1 Venezuela 4 compare
- 1 Vietnam 4 compare
- 1 Zambia 4 compare
- 1 Zimbabwe 4 compare
More reference data data for South Korea
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9638 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.9281 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.55 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2074 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.55 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.23 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 4.37 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 5.17 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 19.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.13 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is openness of executive recruitment score in South Korea?
- Openness of executive recruitment score in South Korea was 4 in 2018, according to Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest openness of executive recruitment score recorded in South Korea?
- The highest recorded value was 4 in 1948.
- What is the lowest openness of executive recruitment score recorded in South Korea?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 in 1961.
- How does South Korea rank for openness of executive recruitment score?
- South Korea ranks 1st out of 167 countries with data for 2018.
- Is openness of executive recruitment score rising or falling in South Korea?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this South Korea data come from?
- The figures come from Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 70 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).