Belarus vs South Korea: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Belarus
4
in 2018
South Korea
4
in 2018
Belarus rank
1st
South Korea rank
1st
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Belarus
- South Korea
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 4 against 4 in South Korea, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 70 shared years of data; in 1948 it was South Korea ahead.
Belarus ranks 1st and South Korea ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 4 | 3.2 | 0.8 | Belarus |
| 1970s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Belarus or South Korea?
- Belarus, at 4 against 4 in South Korea as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Belarus and South Korea?
- 0, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and South Korea?
- 70 years are reported by both, from 1948 to 2018.
- How do Belarus and South Korea rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Belarus ranks 1st and South Korea ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).