Statizoid

Openness of Executive Recruitment Score in Ecuador

Ecuador: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score was 4 in 2018. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2018)
4
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
1st
of 167 countries
All-time high
4
in 1901
All-time low
0
in 1830
Years of data
187
1830–2018

Openness of Executive Recruitment Score in Ecuador, 1830–2018

01234183019242018

Source: Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data.

Analysis

The most recent figure for openness of executive recruitment score in Ecuador is 4, measured in 2018. That is the highest value across all 187 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, openness of executive recruitment score in Ecuador peaked at 4 in 1901 and was at its lowest, 0, in 1830.

Ecuador ranks 1st of 167 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Openness of Executive Recruitment Score in Ecuador, year by year

Year Value Change
1830 0 —
1831 0 —
1832 0 —
1833 0 —
1834 0 —
1835 0 —
1836 0 —
1837 0 —
1838 0 —
1839 0 —
1840 0 —
1841 0 —
1842 0 —
1843 0 —
1844 0 —
1845 0 —
1846 0 —
1847 0 —
1848 0 —
1849 0 —
1850 0 —
1851 0 —
1852 0 —
1853 0 —
1854 0 —
1855 0 —
1856 0 —
1857 0 —
1858 0 —
1859 0 —
1860 0 —
1861 0 —
1862 0 —
1863 0 —
1864 0 —
1865 0 —
1866 0 —
1867 0 —
1868 0 —
1869 0 —
1870 0 —
1871 0 —
1872 0 —
1873 0 —
1874 0 —
1875 0 —
1876 0 —
1877 0 —
1878 0 —
1879 0 —
1880 0 —
1881 0 —
1882 0 —
1883 0 —
1884 0 —
1885 0 —
1886 0 —
1887 0 —
1888 0 —
1889 0 —
1890 0 —
1891 0 —
1892 0 —
1893 0 —
1894 0 —
1895 0 —
1896 0 —
1897 0 —
1898 0 —
1899 0 —
1900 0 —
1901 4 —
1902 4 +0.0%
1903 4 +0.0%
1904 4 +0.0%
1905 4 +0.0%
1906 4 +0.0%
1907 4 +0.0%
1908 4 +0.0%
1909 4 +0.0%
1910 4 +0.0%
1911 4 +0.0%
1912 4 +0.0%
1913 4 +0.0%
1914 4 +0.0%
1915 4 +0.0%
1916 4 +0.0%
1917 4 +0.0%
1918 4 +0.0%
1919 4 +0.0%
1920 4 +0.0%
1921 4 +0.0%
1922 4 +0.0%
1923 4 +0.0%
1924 4 +0.0%
1925 0 -100.0%
1926 0 —
1927 0 —
1928 0 —
1929 0 —
1930 0 —
1931 0 —
1932 0 —
1933 0 —
1934 0 —
1935 0 —
1936 0 —
1937 0 —
1938 0 —
1939 0 —
1940 0 —
1941 0 —
1942 0 —
1943 0 —
1944 0 —
1945 0 —
1946 0 —
1947 0 —
1948 4 —
1949 4 +0.0%
1950 4 +0.0%
1951 4 +0.0%
1952 4 +0.0%
1953 4 +0.0%
1954 4 +0.0%
1955 4 +0.0%
1956 4 +0.0%
1957 4 +0.0%
1958 4 +0.0%
1959 4 +0.0%
1960 4 +0.0%
1961 4 +0.0%
1962 4 +0.0%
1963 0 -100.0%
1964 0 —
1965 0 —
1968 4 —
1969 4 +0.0%
1970 4 +0.0%
1971 4 +0.0%
1972 0 -100.0%
1973 0 —
1974 0 —
1975 0 —
1976 0 —
1977 0 —
1978 0 —
1979 4 —
1980 4 +0.0%
1981 4 +0.0%
1982 4 +0.0%
1983 4 +0.0%
1984 4 +0.0%
1985 4 +0.0%
1986 4 +0.0%
1987 4 +0.0%
1988 4 +0.0%
1989 4 +0.0%
1990 4 +0.0%
1991 4 +0.0%
1992 4 +0.0%
1993 4 +0.0%
1994 4 +0.0%
1995 4 +0.0%
1996 4 +0.0%
1997 4 +0.0%
1998 4 +0.0%
1999 4 +0.0%
2000 4 +0.0%
2001 4 +0.0%
2002 4 +0.0%
2003 4 +0.0%
2004 4 +0.0%
2005 4 +0.0%
2006 4 +0.0%
2007 4 +0.0%
2008 4 +0.0%
2009 4 +0.0%
2010 4 +0.0%
2011 4 +0.0%
2012 4 +0.0%
2013 4 +0.0%
2014 4 +0.0%
2015 4 +0.0%
2016 4 +0.0%
2017 4 +0.0%
2018 4 +0.0%

Ecuador compared with similar countries

  • Ecuador's 4 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 4, 1.0× the median. (47 countries reporting)
  • Ecuador's 4 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 4, 1.0× the median. (24 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1830s 0 0 0 10
1840s 0 0 0 10
1850s 0 0 0 10
1860s 0 0 0 10
1870s 0 0 0 10
1880s 0 0 0 10
1890s 0 0 0 10
1900s 3.6 0 4 10
1910s 4 4 4 10
1920s 2 0 4 10
1930s 0 0 0 10
1940s 0.8 0 4 10
1950s 4 4 4 10
1960s 2.5 0 4 8
1970s 1.2 0 4 10
1980s 4 4 4 10
1990s 4 4 4 10
2000s 4 4 4 10
2010s 4 4 4 9

Countries ranked near Ecuador

  1. 1 Afghanistan 4 compare
  2. 1 Albania 4 compare
  3. 1 Angola 4 compare
  4. 1 Argentina 4 compare
  5. 1 Armenia 4 compare
  6. 1 Australia 4 compare
  7. 1 Austria 4 compare
  8. 1 Azerbaijan 4 compare
  9. 1 Bangladesh 4 compare
  10. 1 Belarus 4 compare
  11. 1 Belgium 4 compare
  12. 1 Benin 4 compare
  13. 1 Bolivia 4 compare
  14. 1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 4 compare
  15. 1 Botswana 4 compare
  16. 1 Brazil 4 compare
  17. 1 Bulgaria 4 compare
  18. 1 Burkina Faso 4 compare
  19. 1 Burundi 4 compare
  20. 1 Canada 4 compare
  21. 1 Cape Verde 4 compare
  22. 1 Central African Republic 4 compare
  23. 1 Chile 4 compare
  24. 1 China 4 compare
  25. 1 Colombia 4 compare
  26. 1 Costa Rica 4 compare
  27. 1 Cote d'Ivoire 4 compare
  28. 1 Croatia 4 compare
  29. 1 Cuba 4 compare
  30. 1 Cyprus 4 compare
  31. 1 Czechia 4 compare
  32. 1 Democratic Republic of Congo 4 compare
  33. 1 Denmark 4 compare
  34. 1 Djibouti 4 compare
  35. 1 Dominican Republic 4 compare
  36. 1 East Timor 4 compare
  37. 1 El Salvador 4 compare
  38. 1 Eritrea 4 compare
  39. 1 Estonia 4 compare
  40. 1 Ethiopia 4 compare
  41. 1 Finland 4 compare
  42. 1 France 4 compare
  43. 1 Gabon 4 compare
  44. 1 Gambia 4 compare
  45. 1 Georgia 4 compare
  46. 1 Germany 4 compare
  47. 1 Ghana 4 compare
  48. 1 Greece 4 compare
  49. 1 Guatemala 4 compare
  50. 1 Guinea 4 compare
  51. 1 Guinea-Bissau 4 compare
  52. 1 Guyana 4 compare
  53. 1 Haiti 4 compare
  54. 1 Honduras 4 compare
  55. 1 Hungary 4 compare
  56. 1 India 4 compare
  57. 1 Indonesia 4 compare
  58. 1 Iran 4 compare
  59. 1 Iraq 4 compare
  60. 1 Ireland 4 compare
  61. 1 Israel 4 compare
  62. 1 Italy 4 compare
  63. 1 Jamaica 4 compare
  64. 1 Japan 4 compare
  65. 1 Kazakhstan 4 compare
  66. 1 Kenya 4 compare
  67. 1 Kyrgyzstan 4 compare
  68. 1 Laos 4 compare
  69. 1 Latvia 4 compare
  70. 1 Lebanon 4 compare
  71. 1 Lesotho 4 compare
  72. 1 Liberia 4 compare
  73. 1 Lithuania 4 compare
  74. 1 Luxembourg 4 compare
  75. 1 Madagascar 4 compare
  76. 1 Malawi 4 compare
  77. 1 Malaysia 4 compare
  78. 1 Mali 4 compare
  79. 1 Mauritius 4 compare
  80. 1 Mexico 4 compare
  81. 1 Moldova 4 compare
  82. 1 Mongolia 4 compare
  83. 1 Montenegro 4 compare
  84. 1 Mozambique 4 compare
  85. 1 Myanmar 4 compare
  86. 1 Namibia 4 compare
  87. 1 Nepal 4 compare
  88. 1 Netherlands 4 compare
  89. 1 New Zealand 4 compare
  90. 1 Nicaragua 4 compare
  91. 1 Niger 4 compare
  92. 1 Nigeria 4 compare
  93. 1 North Macedonia 4 compare
  94. 1 Norway 4 compare
  95. 1 Pakistan 4 compare
  96. 1 Panama 4 compare
  97. 1 Papua New Guinea 4 compare
  98. 1 Paraguay 4 compare
  99. 1 Peru 4 compare
  100. 1 Philippines 4 compare
  101. 1 Poland 4 compare
  102. 1 Portugal 4 compare
  103. 1 Romania 4 compare
  104. 1 Russia 4 compare
  105. 1 Senegal 4 compare
  106. 1 Serbia 4 compare
  107. 1 Sierra Leone 4 compare
  108. 1 Singapore 4 compare
  109. 1 Slovakia 4 compare
  110. 1 Slovenia 4 compare
  111. 1 Solomon Islands 4 compare
  112. 1 Somalia 4 compare
  113. 1 South Africa 4 compare
  114. 1 South Korea 4 compare
  115. 1 Spain 4 compare
  116. 1 Sri Lanka 4 compare
  117. 1 Suriname 4 compare
  118. 1 Sweden 4 compare
  119. 1 Switzerland 4 compare
  120. 1 Syria 4 compare
  121. 1 Taiwan 4 compare
  122. 1 Tajikistan 4 compare
  123. 1 Tanzania 4 compare
  124. 1 Togo 4 compare
  125. 1 Trinidad and Tobago 4 compare
  126. 1 Tunisia 4 compare
  127. 1 Turkmenistan 4 compare
  128. 1 USSR 4 compare
  129. 1 Ukraine 4 compare
  130. 1 United Kingdom 4 compare
  131. 1 United States 4 compare
  132. 1 Uruguay 4 compare
  133. 1 Uzbekistan 4 compare
  134. 1 Vatican 4 compare
  135. 1 Venezuela 4 compare
  136. 1 Vietnam 4 compare
  137. 1 Zambia 4 compare
  138. 1 Zimbabwe 4 compare

See the full ranking of 167 places →

More reference data data for Ecuador

All data for Ecuador →

Frequently asked questions

What is openness of executive recruitment score in Ecuador?
Openness of executive recruitment score in Ecuador was 4 in 2018, according to Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data.
What is the highest openness of executive recruitment score recorded in Ecuador?
The highest recorded value was 4 in 1901.
What is the lowest openness of executive recruitment score recorded in Ecuador?
The lowest recorded value was 0 in 1830.
How does Ecuador rank for openness of executive recruitment score?
Ecuador ranks 1st out of 167 countries with data for 2018.
Is openness of executive recruitment score rising or falling in Ecuador?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Ecuador data come from?
The figures come from Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 187 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Openness of Executive Recruitment Score in Ecuador. Statizoid, drawing on Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/openness-of-executive-recruitment-score/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/openness-of-executive-recruitment-score/ecuador/">Openness of Executive Recruitment Score in Ecuador</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).