Statizoid

Openness of Executive Recruitment Score in USSR

USSR: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score was 4 in 1991. ▬ Flat

Latest (1991)
4
Change on year
unchanged
Rank
1st
of 1 groups
All-time high
4
in 1922
All-time low
4
in 1922
Years of data
70
1922–1991

Openness of Executive Recruitment Score in USSR, 1922–1991

01234192219561991

Source: Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data.

Analysis

In 1991, openness of executive recruitment score in USSR stood at 4. That is the highest value across all 70 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, openness of executive recruitment score in USSR peaked at 4 in 1922 and was at its lowest, 4, in 1922.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1920s 4 4 4 8
1930s 4 4 4 10
1940s 4 4 4 10
1950s 4 4 4 10
1960s 4 4 4 10
1970s 4 4 4 10
1980s 4 4 4 10
1990s 4 4 4 2

Countries ranked near USSR

  1. 1 Afghanistan 4 compare
  2. 1 Albania 4 compare
  3. 1 Angola 4 compare
  4. 1 Argentina 4 compare
  5. 1 Armenia 4 compare
  6. 1 Australia 4 compare
  7. 1 Austria 4 compare
  8. 1 Azerbaijan 4 compare
  9. 1 Bangladesh 4 compare
  10. 1 Belarus 4 compare
  11. 1 Belgium 4 compare
  12. 1 Benin 4 compare
  13. 1 Bolivia 4 compare
  14. 1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 4 compare
  15. 1 Botswana 4 compare
  16. 1 Brazil 4 compare
  17. 1 Bulgaria 4 compare
  18. 1 Burkina Faso 4 compare
  19. 1 Burundi 4 compare
  20. 1 Canada 4 compare
  21. 1 Cape Verde 4 compare
  22. 1 Central African Republic 4 compare
  23. 1 Chile 4 compare
  24. 1 China 4 compare
  25. 1 Colombia 4 compare
  26. 1 Costa Rica 4 compare
  27. 1 Cote d'Ivoire 4 compare
  28. 1 Croatia 4 compare
  29. 1 Cuba 4 compare
  30. 1 Cyprus 4 compare
  31. 1 Czechia 4 compare
  32. 1 Democratic Republic of Congo 4 compare
  33. 1 Denmark 4 compare
  34. 1 Dominican Republic 4 compare
  35. 1 East Timor 4 compare
  36. 1 Ecuador 4 compare
  37. 1 El Salvador 4 compare
  38. 1 Eritrea 4 compare
  39. 1 Estonia 4 compare
  40. 1 Ethiopia 4 compare
  41. 1 Finland 4 compare
  42. 1 France 4 compare
  43. 1 Gabon 4 compare
  44. 1 Gambia 4 compare
  45. 1 Georgia 4 compare
  46. 1 Germany 4 compare
  47. 1 Ghana 4 compare
  48. 1 Greece 4 compare
  49. 1 Guatemala 4 compare
  50. 1 Guinea 4 compare
  51. 1 Guinea-Bissau 4 compare
  52. 1 Guyana 4 compare
  53. 1 Haiti 4 compare
  54. 1 Honduras 4 compare
  55. 1 Hungary 4 compare
  56. 1 India 4 compare
  57. 1 Indonesia 4 compare
  58. 1 Iran 4 compare
  59. 1 Iraq 4 compare
  60. 1 Ireland 4 compare
  61. 1 Israel 4 compare
  62. 1 Italy 4 compare
  63. 1 Jamaica 4 compare
  64. 1 Japan 4 compare
  65. 1 Kazakhstan 4 compare
  66. 1 Kenya 4 compare
  67. 1 Kyrgyzstan 4 compare
  68. 1 Laos 4 compare
  69. 1 Latvia 4 compare
  70. 1 Lebanon 4 compare
  71. 1 Lesotho 4 compare
  72. 1 Liberia 4 compare
  73. 1 Lithuania 4 compare
  74. 1 Luxembourg 4 compare
  75. 1 Madagascar 4 compare
  76. 1 Malawi 4 compare
  77. 1 Malaysia 4 compare
  78. 1 Mali 4 compare
  79. 1 Mauritius 4 compare
  80. 1 Moldova 4 compare
  81. 1 Mongolia 4 compare
  82. 1 Montenegro 4 compare
  83. 1 Mozambique 4 compare
  84. 1 Myanmar 4 compare
  85. 1 Namibia 4 compare
  86. 1 Nepal 4 compare
  87. 1 Netherlands 4 compare
  88. 1 New Zealand 4 compare
  89. 1 Nicaragua 4 compare
  90. 1 Niger 4 compare
  91. 1 Nigeria 4 compare
  92. 1 North Macedonia 4 compare
  93. 1 Norway 4 compare
  94. 1 Pakistan 4 compare
  95. 1 Papua New Guinea 4 compare
  96. 1 Paraguay 4 compare
  97. 1 Peru 4 compare
  98. 1 Philippines 4 compare
  99. 1 Poland 4 compare
  100. 1 Portugal 4 compare
  101. 1 Romania 4 compare
  102. 1 Russia 4 compare
  103. 1 Senegal 4 compare
  104. 1 Serbia 4 compare
  105. 1 Sierra Leone 4 compare
  106. 1 Slovakia 4 compare
  107. 1 Slovenia 4 compare
  108. 1 Solomon Islands 4 compare
  109. 1 Somalia 4 compare
  110. 1 South Africa 4 compare
  111. 1 South Korea 4 compare
  112. 1 Spain 4 compare
  113. 1 Sri Lanka 4 compare
  114. 1 Suriname 4 compare
  115. 1 Sweden 4 compare
  116. 1 Switzerland 4 compare
  117. 1 Syria 4 compare
  118. 1 Taiwan 4 compare
  119. 1 Tajikistan 4 compare
  120. 1 Tanzania 4 compare
  121. 1 Togo 4 compare
  122. 1 Trinidad and Tobago 4 compare
  123. 1 Tunisia 4 compare
  124. 1 Turkmenistan 4 compare
  125. 1 Ukraine 4 compare
  126. 1 United Kingdom 4 compare
  127. 1 United States 4 compare
  128. 1 Uruguay 4 compare
  129. 1 Uzbekistan 4 compare
  130. 1 Vatican 4 compare
  131. 1 Venezuela 4 compare
  132. 1 Vietnam 4 compare
  133. 1 Zambia 4 compare
  134. 1 Zimbabwe 4 compare

See the full ranking of 167 places →

More reference data data for USSR

All data for USSR →

Frequently asked questions

What is openness of executive recruitment score in USSR?
Openness of executive recruitment score in USSR was 4 in 1991, according to Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data.
What is the highest openness of executive recruitment score recorded in USSR?
The highest recorded value was 4 in 1922.
What is the lowest openness of executive recruitment score recorded in USSR?
The lowest recorded value was 4 in 1922.
How does USSR rank for openness of executive recruitment score?
USSR ranks 1st out of 1 groups with data for 1991.
Is openness of executive recruitment score rising or falling in USSR?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this USSR data come from?
The figures come from Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 70 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

About this data

Indicator
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).