Openness of Executive Recruitment Score in Nicaragua
Nicaragua: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score was 4 in 2018. ▼ Falling
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score in Nicaragua, 1838–2018
Source: Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2018, openness of executive recruitment score in Nicaragua stood at 4. That is the highest value across all 179 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, openness of executive recruitment score in Nicaragua peaked at 4 in 1838 and was at its lowest, 0, in 1979.
That places Nicaragua 1st out of 167 countries with data for 2018, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 179 years of available data.
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score in Nicaragua, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1838 | 4 | — |
| 1839 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1941 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1947 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 1980 | 0 | — |
| 1981 | 0 | — |
| 1982 | 0 | — |
| 1983 | 0 | — |
| 1984 | 0 | — |
| 1985 | 0 | — |
| 1986 | 0 | — |
| 1987 | 0 | — |
| 1988 | 0 | — |
| 1989 | 0 | — |
| 1990 | 4 | — |
| 1991 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 4 | +0.0% |
Nicaragua compared with similar countries
- Nicaragua's 4 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 4, 1.0× the median. (43 countries reporting)
- Nicaragua's 4 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 4, 1.0× the median. (24 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1830s | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 |
| 1840s | 4 | 4 | 4 | 10 |
| 1850s | 4 | 4 | 4 | 10 |
| 1860s | 4 | 4 | 4 | 10 |
| 1870s | 4 | 4 | 4 | 10 |
| 1880s | 4 | 4 | 4 | 10 |
| 1890s | 4 | 4 | 4 | 10 |
| 1900s | 4 | 4 | 4 | 10 |
| 1910s | 4 | 4 | 4 | 10 |
| 1920s | 4 | 4 | 4 | 8 |
| 1930s | 4 | 4 | 4 | 10 |
| 1940s | 4 | 4 | 4 | 10 |
| 1950s | 4 | 4 | 4 | 10 |
| 1960s | 4 | 4 | 4 | 10 |
| 1970s | 3.6 | 0 | 4 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1990s | 4 | 4 | 4 | 10 |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 4 | 10 |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
Countries ranked near Nicaragua
- 1 Afghanistan 4 compare
- 1 Albania 4 compare
- 1 Angola 4 compare
- 1 Argentina 4 compare
- 1 Armenia 4 compare
- 1 Australia 4 compare
- 1 Austria 4 compare
- 1 Azerbaijan 4 compare
- 1 Bangladesh 4 compare
- 1 Belarus 4 compare
- 1 Belgium 4 compare
- 1 Benin 4 compare
- 1 Bolivia 4 compare
- 1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 4 compare
- 1 Botswana 4 compare
- 1 Brazil 4 compare
- 1 Bulgaria 4 compare
- 1 Burkina Faso 4 compare
- 1 Burundi 4 compare
- 1 Canada 4 compare
- 1 Cape Verde 4 compare
- 1 Central African Republic 4 compare
- 1 Chile 4 compare
- 1 China 4 compare
- 1 Colombia 4 compare
- 1 Costa Rica 4 compare
- 1 Cote d'Ivoire 4 compare
- 1 Croatia 4 compare
- 1 Cuba 4 compare
- 1 Cyprus 4 compare
- 1 Czechia 4 compare
- 1 Democratic Republic of Congo 4 compare
- 1 Denmark 4 compare
- 1 Djibouti 4 compare
- 1 Dominican Republic 4 compare
- 1 East Timor 4 compare
- 1 Ecuador 4 compare
- 1 El Salvador 4 compare
- 1 Eritrea 4 compare
- 1 Estonia 4 compare
- 1 Ethiopia 4 compare
- 1 Finland 4 compare
- 1 France 4 compare
- 1 Gabon 4 compare
- 1 Gambia 4 compare
- 1 Georgia 4 compare
- 1 Germany 4 compare
- 1 Ghana 4 compare
- 1 Greece 4 compare
- 1 Guatemala 4 compare
- 1 Guinea 4 compare
- 1 Guinea-Bissau 4 compare
- 1 Guyana 4 compare
- 1 Haiti 4 compare
- 1 Honduras 4 compare
- 1 Hungary 4 compare
- 1 India 4 compare
- 1 Indonesia 4 compare
- 1 Iran 4 compare
- 1 Iraq 4 compare
- 1 Ireland 4 compare
- 1 Israel 4 compare
- 1 Italy 4 compare
- 1 Jamaica 4 compare
- 1 Japan 4 compare
- 1 Kazakhstan 4 compare
- 1 Kenya 4 compare
- 1 Kyrgyzstan 4 compare
- 1 Laos 4 compare
- 1 Latvia 4 compare
- 1 Lebanon 4 compare
- 1 Lesotho 4 compare
- 1 Liberia 4 compare
- 1 Lithuania 4 compare
- 1 Luxembourg 4 compare
- 1 Madagascar 4 compare
- 1 Malawi 4 compare
- 1 Malaysia 4 compare
- 1 Mali 4 compare
- 1 Mauritius 4 compare
- 1 Mexico 4 compare
- 1 Moldova 4 compare
- 1 Mongolia 4 compare
- 1 Montenegro 4 compare
- 1 Mozambique 4 compare
- 1 Myanmar 4 compare
- 1 Namibia 4 compare
- 1 Nepal 4 compare
- 1 Netherlands 4 compare
- 1 New Zealand 4 compare
- 1 Niger 4 compare
- 1 Nigeria 4 compare
- 1 North Macedonia 4 compare
- 1 Norway 4 compare
- 1 Pakistan 4 compare
- 1 Panama 4 compare
- 1 Papua New Guinea 4 compare
- 1 Paraguay 4 compare
- 1 Peru 4 compare
- 1 Philippines 4 compare
- 1 Poland 4 compare
- 1 Portugal 4 compare
- 1 Romania 4 compare
- 1 Russia 4 compare
- 1 Senegal 4 compare
- 1 Serbia 4 compare
- 1 Sierra Leone 4 compare
- 1 Singapore 4 compare
- 1 Slovakia 4 compare
- 1 Slovenia 4 compare
- 1 Solomon Islands 4 compare
- 1 Somalia 4 compare
- 1 South Africa 4 compare
- 1 South Korea 4 compare
- 1 Spain 4 compare
- 1 Sri Lanka 4 compare
- 1 Suriname 4 compare
- 1 Sweden 4 compare
- 1 Switzerland 4 compare
- 1 Syria 4 compare
- 1 Taiwan 4 compare
- 1 Tajikistan 4 compare
- 1 Tanzania 4 compare
- 1 Togo 4 compare
- 1 Trinidad and Tobago 4 compare
- 1 Tunisia 4 compare
- 1 Turkmenistan 4 compare
- 1 USSR 4 compare
- 1 Ukraine 4 compare
- 1 United Kingdom 4 compare
- 1 United States 4 compare
- 1 Uruguay 4 compare
- 1 Uzbekistan 4 compare
- 1 Vatican 4 compare
- 1 Venezuela 4 compare
- 1 Vietnam 4 compare
- 1 Zambia 4 compare
- 1 Zimbabwe 4 compare
More reference data data for Nicaragua
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4575 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.72 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.76 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0819 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.76 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.53 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.4557 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 9.61 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14.12 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4457 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is openness of executive recruitment score in Nicaragua?
- Openness of executive recruitment score in Nicaragua was 4 in 2018, according to Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest openness of executive recruitment score recorded in Nicaragua?
- The highest recorded value was 4 in 1838.
- What is the lowest openness of executive recruitment score recorded in Nicaragua?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 in 1979.
- How does Nicaragua rank for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Nicaragua ranks 1st out of 167 countries with data for 2018.
- Is openness of executive recruitment score rising or falling in Nicaragua?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Nicaragua data come from?
- The figures come from Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 179 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).