Georgia vs South Korea: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Georgia
4
in 2018
South Korea
4
in 2018
Georgia rank
1st
South Korea rank
1st
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Georgia
- South Korea
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 4 against 4 in South Korea, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 67 shared years of data; in 1948 it was South Korea ahead.
Georgia ranks 1st and South Korea ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 4 | 3.2 | 0.8 | Georgia |
| 1970s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Georgia or South Korea?
- Georgia, at 4 against 4 in South Korea as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Georgia and South Korea?
- 0, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and South Korea?
- 67 years are reported by both, from 1948 to 2018.
- How do Georgia and South Korea rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Georgia ranks 1st and South Korea ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).