Openness of Executive Recruitment Score in Mozambique
Mozambique: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score was 4 in 2018. β¬ Flat
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score in Mozambique, 1975β2018
Source: Polity 5 (2020) β processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2018, openness of executive recruitment score in Mozambique stood at 4. That is the highest value across all 44 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, openness of executive recruitment score in Mozambique peaked at 4 in 1975 and was at its lowest, 4, in 1975.
Mozambique ranks 1st of 166 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| 1980s | 4 | 4 | 4 | 10 |
| 1990s | 4 | 4 | 4 | 10 |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 4 | 10 |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
Countries ranked near Mozambique
- 1 Afghanistan 4 compare
- 1 Albania 4 compare
- 1 Angola 4 compare
- 1 Argentina 4 compare
- 1 Armenia 4 compare
- 1 Australia 4 compare
- 1 Austria 4 compare
- 1 Azerbaijan 4 compare
- 1 Bangladesh 4 compare
- 1 Belarus 4 compare
- 1 Belgium 4 compare
- 1 Benin 4 compare
- 1 Bolivia 4 compare
- 1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 4 compare
- 1 Botswana 4 compare
- 1 Brazil 4 compare
- 1 Bulgaria 4 compare
- 1 Burkina Faso 4 compare
- 1 Burundi 4 compare
- 1 Canada 4 compare
- 1 Cape Verde 4 compare
- 1 Central African Republic 4 compare
- 1 Chile 4 compare
- 1 China 4 compare
- 1 Colombia 4 compare
- 1 Costa Rica 4 compare
- 1 Cote d'Ivoire 4 compare
- 1 Croatia 4 compare
- 1 Cuba 4 compare
- 1 Cyprus 4 compare
- 1 Czechia 4 compare
- 1 Democratic Republic of Congo 4 compare
- 1 Denmark 4 compare
- 1 Dominican Republic 4 compare
- 1 East Timor 4 compare
- 1 Ecuador 4 compare
- 1 El Salvador 4 compare
- 1 Eritrea 4 compare
- 1 Estonia 4 compare
- 1 Ethiopia 4 compare
- 1 Finland 4 compare
- 1 France 4 compare
- 1 Gabon 4 compare
- 1 Gambia 4 compare
- 1 Georgia 4 compare
- 1 Germany 4 compare
- 1 Ghana 4 compare
- 1 Greece 4 compare
- 1 Guatemala 4 compare
- 1 Guinea 4 compare
- 1 Guinea-Bissau 4 compare
- 1 Guyana 4 compare
- 1 Haiti 4 compare
- 1 Honduras 4 compare
- 1 Hungary 4 compare
- 1 India 4 compare
- 1 Indonesia 4 compare
- 1 Iran 4 compare
- 1 Iraq 4 compare
- 1 Ireland 4 compare
- 1 Israel 4 compare
- 1 Italy 4 compare
- 1 Jamaica 4 compare
- 1 Japan 4 compare
- 1 Kazakhstan 4 compare
- 1 Kenya 4 compare
- 1 Kyrgyzstan 4 compare
- 1 Laos 4 compare
- 1 Latvia 4 compare
- 1 Lebanon 4 compare
- 1 Lesotho 4 compare
- 1 Liberia 4 compare
- 1 Lithuania 4 compare
- 1 Luxembourg 4 compare
- 1 Madagascar 4 compare
- 1 Malawi 4 compare
- 1 Malaysia 4 compare
- 1 Mali 4 compare
- 1 Mauritius 4 compare
- 1 Mexico 4 compare
- 1 Moldova 4 compare
- 1 Mongolia 4 compare
- 1 Montenegro 4 compare
- 1 Myanmar 4 compare
- 1 Namibia 4 compare
- 1 Nepal 4 compare
- 1 Netherlands 4 compare
- 1 New Zealand 4 compare
- 1 Nicaragua 4 compare
- 1 Niger 4 compare
- 1 Nigeria 4 compare
- 1 North Macedonia 4 compare
- 1 Norway 4 compare
- 1 Pakistan 4 compare
- 1 Panama 4 compare
- 1 Papua New Guinea 4 compare
- 1 Paraguay 4 compare
- 1 Peru 4 compare
- 1 Philippines 4 compare
- 1 Poland 4 compare
- 1 Portugal 4 compare
- 1 Romania 4 compare
- 1 Russia 4 compare
- 1 Senegal 4 compare
- 1 Serbia 4 compare
- 1 Sierra Leone 4 compare
- 1 Singapore 4 compare
- 1 Slovakia 4 compare
- 1 Slovenia 4 compare
- 1 Solomon Islands 4 compare
- 1 Somalia 4 compare
- 1 South Africa 4 compare
- 1 South Korea 4 compare
- 1 Spain 4 compare
- 1 Sri Lanka 4 compare
- 1 Suriname 4 compare
- 1 Sweden 4 compare
- 1 Switzerland 4 compare
- 1 Syria 4 compare
- 1 Taiwan 4 compare
- 1 Tajikistan 4 compare
- 1 Tanzania 4 compare
- 1 Togo 4 compare
- 1 Trinidad and Tobago 4 compare
- 1 Tunisia 4 compare
- 1 Turkmenistan 4 compare
- 1 Ukraine 4 compare
- 1 United Kingdom 4 compare
- 1 United States 4 compare
- 1 Uruguay 4 compare
- 1 Uzbekistan 4 compare
- 1 Vatican 4 compare
- 1 Venezuela 4 compare
- 1 Vietnam 4 compare
- 1 Zambia 4 compare
- 1 Zimbabwe 4 compare
More reference data data for Mozambique
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.53 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.53 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2808 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.06 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 27.89 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 9.3 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.53 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 8.28 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure Management 3,206 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is openness of executive recruitment score in Mozambique?
- Openness of executive recruitment score in Mozambique was 4 in 2018, according to Polity 5 (2020) β processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest openness of executive recruitment score recorded in Mozambique?
- The highest recorded value was 4 in 1975.
- What is the lowest openness of executive recruitment score recorded in Mozambique?
- The lowest recorded value was 4 in 1975.
- How does Mozambique rank for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Mozambique ranks 1st out of 166 countries with data for 2018.
- Is openness of executive recruitment score rising or falling in Mozambique?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Mozambique data come from?
- The figures come from Polity 5 (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV Β· JSON β 44 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).