Ecuador vs Mongolia: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Ecuador
4
in 2018
Mongolia
4
in 2018
Ecuador rank
1st
Mongolia rank
1st
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Ecuador
- Mongolia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 4 against 4 in Mongolia, a difference of 0.
Across all 93 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 1st and Mongolia ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 10 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0.6667 | 4 | 3.33 | Mongolia |
| 1930s | 0 | 4 | 4 | Mongolia |
| 1940s | 0.8 | 4 | 3.2 | Mongolia |
| 1950s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 2.5 | 4 | 1.5 | Mongolia |
| 1970s | 1.2 | 4 | 2.8 | Mongolia |
| 1980s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Ecuador or Mongolia?
- Ecuador, at 4 against 4 in Mongolia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Ecuador and Mongolia?
- 0, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mongolia?
- 93 years are reported by both, from 1924 to 2018.
- How do Ecuador and Mongolia rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Ecuador ranks 1st and Mongolia ranks 1st of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).