How does Uruguay rank for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?

Uruguay ranks 1st out of 166 countries with data for 2018.

Is competitiveness of executive recruitment score rising or falling in Uruguay?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.

Where does this Uruguay data come from?

The figures come from Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score in Uruguay

Name: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score in Uruguay
Creator: Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
License: CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)

Uruguay: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score was 3 in 2018. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2018)

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

1st

of 166 countries

All-time high

in 1952

All-time low

in 1830

Years of data

187

1830–2018

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score in Uruguay, 1830–2018

Source: Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data.

Analysis

The most recent figure for competitiveness of executive recruitment score in Uruguay is 3, measured in 2018. That is the highest value across all 187 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, competitiveness of executive recruitment score in Uruguay peaked at 3 in 1952 and was at its lowest, 0, in 1830.

That places Uruguay 1st out of 166 countries with data for 2018, putting it in the top 10%.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

Decade	Average	Lowest	Highest	Years
1830s	0	0	0	10
1840s	0	0	0	10
1850s	0	0	0	10
1860s	0	0	0	10
1870s	0	0	0	10
1880s	0	0	0	10
1890s	0	0	0	10
1900s	0.6	0	1	10
1910s	1	1	1	10
1920s	1	1	1	10
1930s	1	1	1	10
1940s	1	1	1	10
1950s	2.6	1	3	10
1960s	3	3	3	10
1970s	1.25	1	3	8
1980s	1.6	1	3	10
1990s	3	3	3	10
2000s	3	3	3	10
2010s	3	3	3	9

Countries ranked near Uruguay

See the full ranking of 167 places →

More reference data data for Uruguay

Spring temperature anomalies 0.4369 °C (2026)
Summer temperature anomalies -1.57 °C (2026)
Temperature anomalies by month -0.8785 °C (2026)
Universal right to vote in practice 2 (2025)
Autumn temperature anomalies 0.1951 °C (2025)
Winter temperature anomalies 1.51 °C (2025)
Consumer price index 304.15 2010 = 100 (2025)
Universal right to vote 2 (2025)
Competitive elections 1 (2025)
Men's universal right to vote 1 (2025)

All data for Uruguay →

Frequently asked questions

What is competitiveness of executive recruitment score in Uruguay?: Competitiveness of executive recruitment score in Uruguay was 3 in 2018, according to Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data.
What is the highest competitiveness of executive recruitment score recorded in Uruguay?: The highest recorded value was 3 in 1952.
What is the lowest competitiveness of executive recruitment score recorded in Uruguay?: The lowest recorded value was 0 in 1830.
How does Uruguay rank for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?: Uruguay ranks 1st out of 166 countries with data for 2018.
Is competitiveness of executive recruitment score rising or falling in Uruguay?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Uruguay data come from?: The figures come from Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 187 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

About this data

Indicator: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source: Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage: 167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed: 07 August 2026

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).