Nepal vs Uruguay: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Nepal
3
in 2018
Uruguay
3
in 2018
Nepal rank
1st
Uruguay rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Nepal
  • Uruguay
0123180019092018

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 3 against 3 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 185 shared years of data; in 1830 it was Nepal ahead.

Nepal ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Across the 19 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 3 and Uruguay in 11.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal Uruguay Difference Ahead
1830s 1 0 1 Nepal
1840s 0.6 0 0.6 Nepal
1850s 0 0 0 β€”
1860s 0 0 0 β€”
1870s 0 0 0 β€”
1880s 0 0 0 β€”
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0.6 0.6 Uruguay
1910s 0 1 1 Uruguay
1920s 0 1 1 Uruguay
1930s 0 1 1 Uruguay
1940s 0 1 1 Uruguay
1950s 1.12 2.5 1.38 Uruguay
1960s 1 3 2 Uruguay
1970s 1 1.25 0.25 Uruguay
1980s 1.9 1.6 0.3 Nepal
1990s 2 3 1 Uruguay
2000s 1.6 3 1.4 Uruguay
2010s 2.11 3 0.8889 Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Nepal or Uruguay?
Nepal, at 3 against 3 in Uruguay as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Nepal and Uruguay?
0, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Uruguay?
185 years are reported by both, from 1830 to 2018.
How do Nepal and Uruguay rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Nepal ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).