How does Georgia rank for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?

Georgia ranks 1st out of 166 countries with data for 2018.

Is competitiveness of executive recruitment score rising or falling in Georgia?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.

Where does this Georgia data come from?

The figures come from Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score in Georgia

Name: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score in Georgia
Creator: Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
License: CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)

Georgia: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score was 3 in 2018. ▲ Rising

Latest (2018)

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

1st

of 166 countries

All-time high

in 2007

All-time low

in 1917

Years of data

215

1800–2018

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score in Georgia, 1800–2018

Source: Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data.

Analysis

In 2018, competitiveness of executive recruitment score in Georgia stood at 3. That is the highest value across all 215 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, competitiveness of executive recruitment score in Georgia peaked at 3 in 2007 and was at its lowest, 0, in 1917.

That places Georgia 1st out of 166 countries with data for 2018, putting it in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 215 years of available data.

Averages by decade

Decade	Average	Lowest	Highest	Years
1800s	1	1	1	10
1810s	1	1	1	10
1820s	1	1	1	10
1830s	1	1	1	10
1840s	1	1	1	10
1850s	1	1	1	10
1860s	1	1	1	10
1870s	1	1	1	10
1880s	1	1	1	10
1890s	1	1	1	10
1900s	1	1	1	9
1910s	0.7	0	1	10
1920s	0.8	0	1	10
1930s	1	1	1	10
1940s	1	1	1	10
1950s	1	1	1	10
1960s	1	1	1	10
1970s	1	1	1	10
1980s	1	1	1	10
1990s	2	2	2	7
2000s	2.3	2	3	10
2010s	3	3	3	9

Countries ranked near Georgia

See the full ranking of 167 places →

More reference data data for Georgia

Temperature anomalies by month 0.8911 °C (2026)
Spring temperature anomalies 0.5533 °C (2026)
Summer temperature anomalies -0.4557 °C (2026)
Universal right to vote in practice 2 (2025)
Winter temperature anomalies 1.39 °C (2025)
Autumn temperature anomalies -0.4778 °C (2025)
Consumer price index 185.49 2010 = 100 (2025)
Universal right to vote 2 (2025)
Elected parliament 1 (2025)
Free country 1 (2025)

All data for Georgia →

Frequently asked questions

What is competitiveness of executive recruitment score in Georgia?: Competitiveness of executive recruitment score in Georgia was 3 in 2018, according to Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data.
What is the highest competitiveness of executive recruitment score recorded in Georgia?: The highest recorded value was 3 in 2007.
What is the lowest competitiveness of executive recruitment score recorded in Georgia?: The lowest recorded value was 0 in 1917.
How does Georgia rank for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?: Georgia ranks 1st out of 166 countries with data for 2018.
Is competitiveness of executive recruitment score rising or falling in Georgia?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Georgia data come from?: The figures come from Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 215 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

About this data

Indicator: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source: Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage: 167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed: 07 August 2026

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).