Mauritius vs Uruguay: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Mauritius
3
in 2018
Uruguay
3
in 2018
Mauritius rank
1st
Uruguay rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Mauritius
  • Uruguay
0123183019242018

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 3 against 3 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Uruguay ahead.

Mauritius ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 3 3 0 β€”
1970s 3 1.25 1.75 Mauritius
1980s 3 1.6 1.4 Mauritius
1990s 3 3 0 β€”
2000s 3 3 0 β€”
2010s 3 3 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Mauritius or Uruguay?
Mauritius, at 3 against 3 in Uruguay as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Mauritius and Uruguay?
0, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Uruguay?
49 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2018.
How do Mauritius and Uruguay rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Mauritius ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).