Hungary vs Uruguay: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Hungary
3
in 2018
Uruguay
3
in 2018
Hungary rank
1st
Uruguay rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Hungary
  • Uruguay
0123183019242018

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 3 against 3 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 143 shared years of data; in 1867 it was Hungary ahead.

Hungary ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Across the 16 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 5 and Uruguay in 8.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Uruguay Difference Ahead
1860s 1 0 1 Hungary
1870s 1 0 1 Hungary
1880s 1 0 1 Hungary
1890s 1 0 1 Hungary
1900s 1 0.6 0.4 Hungary
1910s 0.8889 1 0.1111 Uruguay
1920s 0 1 1 Uruguay
1930s 0 1 1 Uruguay
1940s 0.3333 1 0.6667 Uruguay
1950s 1 2.56 1.56 Uruguay
1960s 1 3 2 Uruguay
1970s 1 1.25 0.25 Uruguay
1980s 1.11 1.44 0.3333 Uruguay
1990s 3 3 0
2000s 3 3 0
2010s 3 3 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Hungary or Uruguay?
Hungary, at 3 against 3 in Uruguay as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Hungary and Uruguay?
0, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Uruguay?
143 years are reported by both, from 1867 to 2018.
How do Hungary and Uruguay rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Hungary ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).