Australia vs Uruguay: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Australia
3
in 2018
Uruguay
3
in 2018
Australia rank
1st
Uruguay rank
1st
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Australia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Australia currently reports 3 against 3 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 116 shared years of data; in 1901 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 3 | 0.6667 | 2.33 | Australia |
| 1910s | 3 | 1 | 2 | Australia |
| 1920s | 3 | 1 | 2 | Australia |
| 1930s | 3 | 1 | 2 | Australia |
| 1940s | 3 | 1 | 2 | Australia |
| 1950s | 3 | 2.6 | 0.4 | Australia |
| 1960s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 3 | 1.25 | 1.75 | Australia |
| 1980s | 3 | 1.6 | 1.4 | Australia |
| 1990s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Australia or Uruguay?
- Australia, at 3 against 3 in Uruguay as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Australia and Uruguay?
- 0, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Uruguay?
- 116 years are reported by both, from 1901 to 2018.
- How do Australia and Uruguay rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Australia ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).