Malaysia vs Uruguay: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Malaysia
3
in 2018
Uruguay
3
in 2018
Malaysia rank
1st
Uruguay rank
1st
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Malaysia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 3 against 3 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1957 it was Uruguay ahead.
Malaysia ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 2.33 | 3 | 0.6667 | Uruguay |
| 1960s | 2.9 | 3 | 0.1 | Uruguay |
| 1970s | 2 | 1.25 | 0.75 | Malaysia |
| 1980s | 2 | 1.6 | 0.4 | Malaysia |
| 1990s | 2 | 3 | 1 | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 2.2 | 3 | 0.8 | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Malaysia or Uruguay?
- Malaysia, at 3 against 3 in Uruguay as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Malaysia and Uruguay?
- 0, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Uruguay?
- 60 years are reported by both, from 1957 to 2018.
- How do Malaysia and Uruguay rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Malaysia ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).