Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score in Bolivia
Bolivia: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score was 3 in 2018. ◆ Volatile
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score in Bolivia, 1825–2018
Source: Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
Bolivia recorded 3 for competitiveness of executive recruitment score in 2018. That is the highest value across all 192 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, competitiveness of executive recruitment score in Bolivia peaked at 3 in 1985 and was at its lowest, 0, in 1836.
That places Bolivia 1st out of 167 countries with data for 2018, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score in Bolivia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1825 | 1 | — |
| 1826 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 1837 | 0 | — |
| 1838 | 0 | — |
| 1839 | 1 | — |
| 1840 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 1865 | 0 | — |
| 1866 | 0 | — |
| 1867 | 0 | — |
| 1868 | 0 | — |
| 1869 | 0 | — |
| 1870 | 0 | — |
| 1871 | 0 | — |
| 1873 | 2 | — |
| 1874 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 1877 | 0 | — |
| 1878 | 0 | — |
| 1879 | 0 | — |
| 1880 | 2 | — |
| 1881 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 1 | -50.0% |
| 1937 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1941 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1947 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 2 | +100.0% |
| 1953 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 1965 | 0 | — |
| 1966 | 0 | — |
| 1967 | 0 | — |
| 1968 | 0 | — |
| 1969 | 0 | — |
| 1970 | 0 | — |
| 1971 | 0 | — |
| 1972 | 0 | — |
| 1973 | 0 | — |
| 1974 | 0 | — |
| 1975 | 0 | — |
| 1976 | 0 | — |
| 1977 | 0 | — |
| 1978 | 0 | — |
| 1979 | 0 | — |
| 1980 | 0 | — |
| 1981 | 0 | — |
| 1982 | 2 | — |
| 1983 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 3 | +50.0% |
| 1986 | 3 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 3 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 3 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 3 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 3 | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 3 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 3 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 3 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 3 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 3 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 3 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 3 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 3 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 3 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 3 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 3 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 3 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 3 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 3 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 3 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 3 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 3 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 3 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 3 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 3 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 3 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 3 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 3 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 3 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 3 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3 | +0.0% |
Bolivia compared with similar countries
- Bolivia's 3 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 2, 1.5× the median. (43 countries reporting)
- Bolivia's 3 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 3, 1.0× the median. (24 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1820s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| 1830s | 0.7 | 0 | 1 | 10 |
| 1840s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| 1850s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.4 | 0 | 1 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.6667 | 0 | 2 | 9 |
| 1880s | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 |
| 1890s | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 |
| 1900s | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 |
| 1910s | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 |
| 1920s | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 |
| 1930s | 1.6 | 1 | 2 | 10 |
| 1940s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 1950s | 1.8 | 1 | 2 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.8 | 0 | 2 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1980s | 2.1 | 0 | 3 | 10 |
| 1990s | 3 | 3 | 3 | 10 |
| 2000s | 3 | 3 | 3 | 10 |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
Countries ranked near Bolivia
- 1 Albania 3 compare
- 1 Argentina 3 compare
- 1 Australia 3 compare
- 1 Austria 3 compare
- 1 Belgium 3 compare
- 1 Benin 3 compare
- 1 Brazil 3 compare
- 1 Bulgaria 3 compare
- 1 Canada 3 compare
- 1 Cape Verde 3 compare
- 1 Chile 3 compare
- 1 Colombia 3 compare
- 1 Costa Rica 3 compare
- 1 Croatia 3 compare
- 1 Cyprus 3 compare
- 1 Czechia 3 compare
- 1 Denmark 3 compare
- 1 Dominican Republic 3 compare
- 1 East Timor 3 compare
- 1 Ecuador 3 compare
- 1 El Salvador 3 compare
- 1 Estonia 3 compare
- 1 Finland 3 compare
- 1 France 3 compare
- 1 Georgia 3 compare
- 1 Germany 3 compare
- 1 Ghana 3 compare
- 1 Greece 3 compare
- 1 Guatemala 3 compare
- 1 Guyana 3 compare
- 1 Honduras 3 compare
- 1 Hungary 3 compare
- 1 India 3 compare
- 1 Indonesia 3 compare
- 1 Ireland 3 compare
- 1 Italy 3 compare
- 1 Jamaica 3 compare
- 1 Japan 3 compare
- 1 Kenya 3 compare
- 1 Kyrgyzstan 3 compare
- 1 Lesotho 3 compare
- 1 Liberia 3 compare
- 1 Lithuania 3 compare
- 1 Luxembourg 3 compare
- 1 Malaysia 3 compare
- 1 Mauritius 3 compare
- 1 Mexico 3 compare
- 1 Moldova 3 compare
- 1 Mongolia 3 compare
- 1 Montenegro 3 compare
- 1 Nepal 3 compare
- 1 Netherlands 3 compare
- 1 New Zealand 3 compare
- 1 Nigeria 3 compare
- 1 North Macedonia 3 compare
- 1 Norway 3 compare
- 1 Pakistan 3 compare
- 1 Panama 3 compare
- 1 Paraguay 3 compare
- 1 Peru 3 compare
- 1 Philippines 3 compare
- 1 Poland 3 compare
- 1 Portugal 3 compare
- 1 Romania 3 compare
- 1 Senegal 3 compare
- 1 Serbia 3 compare
- 1 Sierra Leone 3 compare
- 1 Slovakia 3 compare
- 1 Slovenia 3 compare
- 1 Solomon Islands 3 compare
- 1 South Africa 3 compare
- 1 South Korea 3 compare
- 1 Spain 3 compare
- 1 Sri Lanka 3 compare
- 1 Sweden 3 compare
- 1 Switzerland 3 compare
- 1 Taiwan 3 compare
- 1 Trinidad and Tobago 3 compare
- 1 United Kingdom 3 compare
- 1 United States 3 compare
- 1 Uruguay 3 compare
- 1 Zambia 3 compare
More reference data data for Bolivia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.7329 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 3.91 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.22 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3892 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.22 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.46 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.33 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 18.39 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 25.12 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.12 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is competitiveness of executive recruitment score in Bolivia?
- Competitiveness of executive recruitment score in Bolivia was 3 in 2018, according to Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest competitiveness of executive recruitment score recorded in Bolivia?
- The highest recorded value was 3 in 1985.
- What is the lowest competitiveness of executive recruitment score recorded in Bolivia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 in 1836.
- How does Bolivia rank for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Bolivia ranks 1st out of 167 countries with data for 2018.
- Is competitiveness of executive recruitment score rising or falling in Bolivia?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Bolivia data come from?
- The figures come from Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 192 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).