Mongolia vs Uruguay: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Mongolia
3
in 2018
Uruguay
3
in 2018
Mongolia rank
1st
Uruguay rank
1st
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Mongolia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 3 against 3 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.
Across all 93 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 10 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 1 | 2.6 | 1.6 | Uruguay |
| 1960s | 1 | 3 | 2 | Uruguay |
| 1970s | 1 | 1.25 | 0.25 | Uruguay |
| 1980s | 1 | 1.6 | 0.6 | Uruguay |
| 1990s | 2.8 | 3 | 0.2 | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Mongolia or Uruguay?
- Mongolia, at 3 against 3 in Uruguay as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 0, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 93 years are reported by both, from 1924 to 2018.
- How do Mongolia and Uruguay rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Mongolia ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).