Romania vs Uruguay: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Romania
3
in 2018
Uruguay
3
in 2018
Romania rank
1st
Uruguay rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Romania
  • Uruguay
0123183019242018

How they compare

Romania currently reports 3 against 3 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 153 shared years of data; in 1859 it was Romania ahead.

Romania ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Across the 17 decades both report, Romania averaged higher in 6 and Uruguay in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Romania Uruguay Difference Ahead
1850s 1 0 1 Romania
1860s 0.8 0 0.8 Romania
1870s 1 0 1 Romania
1880s 1 0 1 Romania
1890s 1 0 1 Romania
1900s 1 0.6 0.4 Romania
1910s 1 1 0 β€”
1920s 1 1 0 β€”
1930s 1 1 0 β€”
1940s 0.5714 1 0.4286 Uruguay
1950s 1 2.6 1.6 Uruguay
1960s 1 3 2 Uruguay
1970s 1 1.25 0.25 Uruguay
1980s 1 1.44 0.4444 Uruguay
1990s 2.4 3 0.6 Uruguay
2000s 3 3 0 β€”
2010s 3 3 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Romania or Uruguay?
Romania, at 3 against 3 in Uruguay as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Romania and Uruguay?
0, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Uruguay?
153 years are reported by both, from 1859 to 2018.
How do Romania and Uruguay rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Romania ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).