What is the lowest competitiveness of executive recruitment score recorded in Indonesia?

The lowest recorded value was 1 in 1945.

How does Indonesia rank for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?

Indonesia ranks 1st out of 166 countries with data for 2018.

Is competitiveness of executive recruitment score rising or falling in Indonesia?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.

Where does this Indonesia data come from?

The figures come from Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score in Indonesia

Name: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score in Indonesia
Creator: Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
License: CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)

Indonesia: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score was 3 in 2018. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2018)

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

1st

of 166 countries

All-time high

in 2004

All-time low

in 1945

Years of data

1945–2018

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score in Indonesia, 1945–2018

Source: Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data.

Analysis

The most recent figure for competitiveness of executive recruitment score in Indonesia is 3, measured in 2018. That is the highest value across all 74 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, competitiveness of executive recruitment score in Indonesia peaked at 3 in 2004 and was at its lowest, 1, in 1945.

Indonesia ranks 1st of 166 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

Decade	Average	Lowest	Highest	Years
1940s	1	1	1	5
1950s	1	1	1	10
1960s	1	1	1	10
1970s	1	1	1	10
1980s	1	1	1	10
1990s	1.1	1	2	10
2000s	2.6	2	3	10
2010s	3	3	3	9

Countries ranked near Indonesia

See the full ranking of 167 places →

More reference data data for Indonesia

Spring temperature anomalies 0.2606 °C (2026)
Summer temperature anomalies 0.5099 °C (2026)
Temperature anomalies by month 0.3525 °C (2026)
Universal right to vote in practice 2 (2025)
Autumn temperature anomalies 0.2785 °C (2025)
Winter temperature anomalies 0.223 °C (2025)
Consumer price index 176.05 2010 = 100 (2025)
Universal right to vote 2 (2025)
Competitive elections 1 (2025)
Men's universal right to vote 1 (2025)

All data for Indonesia →

Frequently asked questions

What is competitiveness of executive recruitment score in Indonesia?: Competitiveness of executive recruitment score in Indonesia was 3 in 2018, according to Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data.
What is the highest competitiveness of executive recruitment score recorded in Indonesia?: The highest recorded value was 3 in 2004.
What is the lowest competitiveness of executive recruitment score recorded in Indonesia?: The lowest recorded value was 1 in 1945.
How does Indonesia rank for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?: Indonesia ranks 1st out of 166 countries with data for 2018.
Is competitiveness of executive recruitment score rising or falling in Indonesia?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Indonesia data come from?: The figures come from Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 74 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

About this data

Indicator: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source: Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage: 167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed: 07 August 2026

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).