Mexico vs Uruguay: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Mexico
3
in 2018
Uruguay
3
in 2018
Mexico rank
1st
Uruguay rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Mexico
  • Uruguay
0123182219202018

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 3 against 3 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 173 shared years of data; in 1830 it was Uruguay ahead.

Mexico ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Across the 19 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 5 and Uruguay in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Uruguay Difference Ahead
1830s 0 0 0 β€”
1840s 0 0 0 β€”
1850s 0 0 0 β€”
1860s 0.3333 0 0.3333 Mexico
1870s 1 0 1 Mexico
1880s 1 0 1 Mexico
1890s 1 0 1 Mexico
1900s 1 0.6 0.4 Mexico
1910s 0.25 1 0.75 Uruguay
1920s 0.6 1 0.4 Uruguay
1930s 1 1 0 β€”
1940s 1 1 0 β€”
1950s 1 2.6 1.6 Uruguay
1960s 1 3 2 Uruguay
1970s 1 1.25 0.25 Uruguay
1980s 1 1.6 0.6 Uruguay
1990s 1.6 3 1.4 Uruguay
2000s 3 3 0 β€”
2010s 3 3 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Mexico or Uruguay?
Mexico, at 3 against 3 in Uruguay as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Mexico and Uruguay?
0, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Uruguay?
173 years are reported by both, from 1830 to 2018.
How do Mexico and Uruguay rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Mexico ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).