Austria vs Uruguay: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Austria
3
in 2018
Uruguay
3
in 2018
Austria rank
1st
Uruguay rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Austria
  • Uruguay
0123180019092018

How they compare

Austria currently reports 3 against 3 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 176 shared years of data; in 1830 it was Austria ahead.

Austria ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 19 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Uruguay Difference Ahead
1830s 1 0 1 Austria
1840s 1 0 1 Austria
1850s 1 0 1 Austria
1860s 1 0 1 Austria
1870s 1 0 1 Austria
1880s 1 0 1 Austria
1890s 1 0 1 Austria
1900s 1 0.6 0.4 Austria
1910s 1 1 0 β€”
1920s 3 1 2 Austria
1930s 1.86 1 0.8571 Austria
1940s 3 1 2 Austria
1950s 3 2.6 0.4 Austria
1960s 3 3 0 β€”
1970s 3 1.25 1.75 Austria
1980s 3 1.6 1.4 Austria
1990s 3 3 0 β€”
2000s 3 3 0 β€”
2010s 3 3 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Austria or Uruguay?
Austria, at 3 against 3 in Uruguay as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Austria and Uruguay?
0, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Uruguay?
176 years are reported by both, from 1830 to 2018.
How do Austria and Uruguay rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Austria ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).