How does Norway rank for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?

Norway ranks 1st out of 166 countries with data for 2018.

Is competitiveness of executive recruitment score rising or falling in Norway?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.

Where does this Norway data come from?

The figures come from Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score in Norway

Name: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score in Norway
Creator: Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
License: CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)

Norway: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score was 3 in 2018. ▲ Rising

Latest (2018)

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

1st

of 166 countries

All-time high

in 1898

All-time low

in 1814

Years of data

200

1814–2018

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score in Norway, 1814–2018

Source: Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data.

Analysis

In 2018, competitiveness of executive recruitment score in Norway stood at 3. That is the highest value across all 200 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, competitiveness of executive recruitment score in Norway peaked at 3 in 1898 and was at its lowest, 1, in 1814.

Norway ranks 1st of 166 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 200 years of available data.

Averages by decade

Decade	Average	Lowest	Highest	Years
1810s	1	1	1	6
1820s	1	1	1	10
1830s	1	1	1	10
1840s	1	1	1	10
1850s	1	1	1	10
1860s	1	1	1	10
1870s	1	1	1	10
1880s	1	1	1	10
1890s	1.4	1	3	10
1900s	3	3	3	10
1910s	3	3	3	10
1920s	3	3	3	10
1930s	3	3	3	10
1940s	3	3	3	5
1950s	3	3	3	10
1960s	3	3	3	10
1970s	3	3	3	10
1980s	3	3	3	10
1990s	3	3	3	10
2000s	3	3	3	10
2010s	3	3	3	9

Countries ranked near Norway

See the full ranking of 167 places →

More reference data data for Norway

Spring temperature anomalies 4.27 °C (2026)
Summer temperature anomalies 1.74 °C (2026)
Temperature anomalies by month -2.84 °C (2026)
Universal right to vote in practice 2 (2025)
Autumn temperature anomalies 2.11 °C (2025)
Winter temperature anomalies 3.43 °C (2025)
Consumer price index 149.54 2010 = 100 (2025)
Universal right to vote 2 (2025)
Competitive elections 1 (2025)
Men's universal right to vote 1 (2025)

All data for Norway →

Frequently asked questions

What is competitiveness of executive recruitment score in Norway?: Competitiveness of executive recruitment score in Norway was 3 in 2018, according to Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data.
What is the highest competitiveness of executive recruitment score recorded in Norway?: The highest recorded value was 3 in 1898.
What is the lowest competitiveness of executive recruitment score recorded in Norway?: The lowest recorded value was 1 in 1814.
How does Norway rank for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?: Norway ranks 1st out of 166 countries with data for 2018.
Is competitiveness of executive recruitment score rising or falling in Norway?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Norway data come from?: The figures come from Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 200 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

About this data

Indicator: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source: Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage: 167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed: 07 August 2026

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).