Statizoid

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score by country

The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology...

Countries reporting
190
Highest
91.67
China (People’s Republic of)
Lowest
8.33
Iraq
Median
44.44
Years covered
5
2015–2019
Data points
950

What the numbers show

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score is currently reported for 190 countries. The highest value is 91.67 in China (People’s Republic of); the lowest is 8.33 in Iraq.

The median across all reporting countries is 44.44, and the mean is 48.03.

The gap between the highest and lowest reporting country is a factor of about 11.

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19): full country ranking

#Country LatestYear 10-year changeTrend
1 China (People’s Republic of) 91.67 2019 — rising
2 Kazakhstan 88.89 2019 — rising
2 Rwanda 88.89 2019 — rising
4 Australia 86.11 2019 — flat
4 Singapore 86.11 2019 — flat
6 United Kingdom 83.33 2019 — flat
6 Lithuania 83.33 2019 — flat
6 Türkiye 83.33 2019 — rising
9 United States 81.11 2019 — flat
10 Korea 80.56 2019 — flat
11 United Arab Emirates 77.78 2019 — flat
11 Denmark 77.78 2019 — rising
11 Norway 77.78 2019 — rising
11 Romania 77.78 2019 — flat
11 Taiwan 77.78 2019 — rising
16 Estonia 75 2019 — flat
16 Israel 75 2019 — flat
16 Latvia 75 2019 — rising
16 Mauritius 75 2019 — rising
16 Portugal 75 2019 — flat
16 Serbia 75 2019 — flat
16 Slovak Republic 75 2019 — rising
23 Brazil 72.69 2019 — rising
24 Austria 72.22 2019 — flat
24 Croatia 72.22 2019 — flat
24 Italy 72.22 2019 — flat
24 North Macedonia 72.22 2019 — falling
24 Malaysia 72.22 2019 — flat
29 Argentina 69.44 2019 — rising
29 Germany 69.44 2019 — rising
29 Greece 69.44 2019 — flat
29 Hungary 69.44 2019 — rising
33 France 66.67 2019 — flat
33 Georgia 66.67 2019 — rising
33 Sweden 66.67 2019 — flat
36 Armenia 63.89 2019 — rising
36 Antigua and Barbuda 63.89 2019 — flat
36 Brunei 63.89 2019 — rising
36 Dominica 63.89 2019 — flat
36 Spain 63.89 2019 — rising
36 Saint Kitts and Nevis 63.89 2019 — flat
36 Saint Lucia 63.89 2019 — flat
36 Montenegro 63.89 2019 — flat
36 Saudi Arabia 63.89 2019 — rising
36 Slovenia 63.89 2019 — rising
36 Ukraine 63.89 2019 — rising
36 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 63.89 2019 — flat
48 Canada 61.11 2019 — rising
48 Grenada 61.11 2019 — flat
48 Moldova 61.11 2019 — rising
48 Poland 61.11 2019 — rising
48 Puerto Rico 61.11 2019 — rising
53 Azerbaijan 58.33 2019 — rising
53 Bulgaria 58.33 2019 — flat
53 Switzerland 58.33 2019 — rising
53 India 58.33 2019 — rising
53 Malta 58.33 2019 — flat
53 Namibia 58.33 2019 — rising
53 Paraguay 58.33 2019 — rising
60 Mexico 56.08 2019 — flat
61 Chile 55.56 2019 — rising
61 Hong Kong (China) 55.56 2019 — flat
63 Bosnia and Herzegovina 52.78 2019 — flat
63 Côte d’Ivoire 52.78 2019 — rising
63 Costa Rica 52.78 2019 — rising
63 Czechia 52.78 2019 — flat
63 Jamaica 52.78 2019 — rising
63 Morocco 52.78 2019 — rising
63 Malawi 52.78 2019 — rising
63 New Zealand 52.78 2019 — falling
63 Peru 52.78 2019 — flat
63 Palau 52.78 2019 — flat
63 Russia 52.78 2019 — flat
74 Nigeria 50.86 2019 — rising
75 Bahrain 50 2019 — rising
75 Colombia 50 2019 — rising
75 Kenya 50 2019 — flat
75 Solomon Islands 50 2019 — flat
75 Kosovo 50 2019 — flat
80 Indonesia 49.39 2019 — rising
81 Finland 47.22 2019 — flat
81 Guinea-Bissau 47.22 2019 — rising
81 Ireland 47.22 2019 — rising
81 Sri Lanka 47.22 2019 — rising
81 Lesotho 47.22 2019 — flat
81 Luxembourg 47.22 2019 — flat
81 Mozambique 47.22 2019 — flat
81 Papua New Guinea 47.22 2019 — flat
81 Thailand 47.22 2019 — rising
81 Uganda 47.22 2019 — flat
81 Uzbekistan 47.22 2019 — rising
81 South Africa 47.22 2019 — rising
93 Belgium 44.44 2019 — flat
93 Bahamas 44.44 2019 — flat
93 Belize 44.44 2019 — flat
93 Bhutan 44.44 2019 — rising
93 Cyprus 44.44 2019 — rising
93 Jordan 44.44 2019 — rising
93 Madagascar 44.44 2019 — rising
93 Marshall Islands 44.44 2019 — flat
93 Mauritania 44.44 2019 — rising
93 Niger 44.44 2019 — rising
93 Panama 44.44 2019 — flat
93 Sierra Leone 44.44 2019 — flat
93 El Salvador 44.44 2019 — flat
93 Trinidad and Tobago 44.44 2019 — flat
93 Uruguay 44.44 2019 — flat
108 Albania 41.67 2019 — rising
108 Burkina Faso 41.67 2019 — rising
108 Bangladesh 41.67 2019 — flat
108 Belarus 41.67 2019 — flat
108 Cape Verde 41.67 2019 — flat
108 Fiji 41.67 2019 — flat
108 Guyana 41.67 2019 — rising
108 Honduras 41.67 2019 — flat
108 Iceland 41.67 2019 — flat
108 Japan 41.67 2019 — flat
108 Kuwait 41.67 2019 — rising
108 Liberia 41.67 2019 — flat
108 Oman 41.67 2019 — rising
108 Philippines 41.67 2019 — flat
108 Eswatini 41.67 2019 — flat
108 Vietnam 41.67 2019 — rising
124 Barbados 38.89 2019 — rising
124 Botswana 38.89 2019 — flat
124 Ethiopia 38.89 2019 — rising
124 Netherlands 38.89 2019 — flat
124 Chad 38.89 2019 — rising
124 Venezuela 38.89 2019 — flat
130 Benin 36.11 2019 — rising
130 Dominican Republic 36.11 2019 — rising
130 Ecuador 36.11 2019 — rising
130 Ghana 36.11 2019 — flat
130 Haiti 36.11 2019 — flat
130 Lebanon 36.11 2019 — rising
130 Nicaragua 36.11 2019 — flat
130 Senegal 36.11 2019 — flat
130 Seychelles 36.11 2019 — rising
130 Tajikistan 36.11 2019 — flat
130 Tunisia 36.11 2019 — flat
130 Vanuatu 36.11 2019 — flat
130 Zambia 36.11 2019 — rising
130 Zimbabwe 36.11 2019 — rising
144 Bolivia 33.33 2019 — rising
144 Guatemala 33.33 2019 — flat
144 Kiribati 33.33 2019 — flat
144 Nepal 33.33 2019 — rising
144 Tanzania 33.33 2019 — flat
149 Pakistan 31.39 2019 — flat
150 Angola 30.56 2019 — rising
150 Central African Republic 30.56 2019 — rising
150 Democratic Republic of Congo 30.56 2019 — rising
150 Comoros 30.56 2019 — rising
150 Djibouti 30.56 2019 — rising
150 Algeria 30.56 2019 — flat
150 Maldives 30.56 2019 — flat
150 Mongolia 30.56 2019 — flat
150 San Marino 30.56 2019 — flat
150 Togo 30.56 2019 — rising
150 Samoa 30.56 2019 — falling
161 Afghanistan 27.78 2019 — flat
161 Burundi 27.78 2019 — flat
161 Cameroon 27.78 2019 — rising
161 Congo 27.78 2019 — rising
161 Guinea 27.78 2019 — rising
161 Gambia 27.78 2019 — flat
161 Iran 27.78 2019 — rising
161 Kyrgyzstan 27.78 2019 — rising
161 Mali 27.78 2019 — rising
170 Micronesia (country) 25 2019 — flat
170 Cambodia 25 2019 — flat
170 Qatar 25 2019 — flat
170 Somalia 25 2019 — flat
170 Sao Tome and Principe 25 2019 — flat
170 Tonga 25 2019 — flat
176 Egypt 22.22 2019 — flat
176 Gabon 22.22 2019 — flat
176 Libya 22.22 2019 — flat
176 Myanmar 22.22 2019 — rising
176 Palestine 22.22 2019 — flat
176 Sudan 22.22 2019 — rising
176 Syria 22.22 2019 — flat
176 Yemen 22.22 2019 — flat
184 Equatorial Guinea 19.44 2019 — rising
184 Laos 19.44 2019 — flat
184 South Sudan 19.44 2019 — flat
184 Suriname 19.44 2019 — flat
188 Eritrea 16.67 2019 — flat
189 East Timor 13.89 2019 — flat
190 Iraq 8.33 2019 — flat

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) by country. Statizoid. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/">Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) by country</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.