Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Iran, Islamic Republic of

Iran, Islamic Republic of: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) was 27.78 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
27.78
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
161st
of 190 countries
All-time high
27.78
in 2016
All-time low
22.22
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Iran, Islamic Republic of, 2015–2019

01020302015201720192015: 22.22016: 27.82017: 27.82018: 27.82019: 27.8

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Iran, Islamic Republic of is 27.78, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 25.0% over five years.

Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 161st of 190 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Iran, Islamic Republic of, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Iran, Islamic Republic of, 2015 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2015 22.22
2016 27.78 +25.0%
2017 27.78 +0.0%
2018 27.78 +0.0%
2019 27.78 +0.0%

Countries ranked near Iran, Islamic Republic of

  1. 161 Afghanistan 27.78 compare
  2. 161 Burundi 27.78 compare
  3. 161 Cameroon 27.78 compare
  4. 161 Congo 27.78 compare
  5. 161 Gambia 27.78 compare
  6. 161 Guinea 27.78 compare
  7. 161 Kyrgyzstan 27.78 compare
  8. 161 Mali 27.78 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Iran, Islamic Republic of

All data for Iran, Islamic Republic of →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Iran, Islamic Republic of?
Enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Iran, Islamic Republic of was 27.78 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) recorded in Iran, Islamic Republic of?
The highest recorded value was 27.78 in 2016.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) recorded in Iran, Islamic Republic of?
The lowest recorded value was 22.22 in 2015.
How does Iran, Islamic Republic of rank for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 161st out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Iran, Islamic Republic of data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Iran, Islamic Republic of. Statizoid. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/iran-islamic-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/iran-islamic-rep/">Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Iran, Islamic Republic of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.