Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Indonesia

Indonesia: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) was 49.39 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
49.39
Change on year
up 12.7%
World rank
80th
of 190 countries
All-time high
49.39
in 2019
All-time low
35.5
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Indonesia, 2015–2019

010203040502015201720192015: 35.52016: 43.82017: 43.82018: 43.82019: 49.4

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Indonesia stood at 49.39. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 12.7% on the previous year and up 39.1% over five years.

Indonesia ranks 80th of 190 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Indonesia, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Indonesia, 2015 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2015 35.5
2016 43.83 +23.5%
2017 43.83 +0.0%
2018 43.83 +0.0%
2019 49.39 +12.7%

Countries ranked near Indonesia

  1. 81 Finland 47.22 compare
  2. 81 Guinea-Bissau 47.22 compare
  3. 81 Ireland 47.22 compare
  4. 81 Lesotho 47.22 compare
  5. 81 Luxembourg 47.22 compare
  6. 81 Mozambique 47.22 compare
  7. 81 Papua New Guinea 47.22 compare
  8. 81 South Africa 47.22 compare
  9. 81 Sri Lanka 47.22 compare
  10. 81 Thailand 47.22 compare
  11. 81 Uganda 47.22 compare
  12. 81 Uzbekistan 47.22 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Indonesia

All data for Indonesia →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Indonesia?
Enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Indonesia was 49.39 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) recorded in Indonesia?
The highest recorded value was 49.39 in 2019.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) recorded in Indonesia?
The lowest recorded value was 35.5 in 2015.
How does Indonesia rank for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
Indonesia ranks 80th out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Indonesia data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Indonesia. Statizoid. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/indonesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/indonesia/">Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Indonesia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.