Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Dominican Republic

Dominican Republic: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) was 36.11 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
36.11
Change on year
up 44.4%
World rank
131st
of 191 countries
All-time high
36.11
in 2019
All-time low
25
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Dominican Republic, 2015–2019

0102030402015201720192015: 252016: 252017: 252018: 252019: 36.1

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Dominican Republic stood at 36.11. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

That represents a change of up 44.4% on the previous year and up 44.4% over five years.

Dominican Republic ranks 131st of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Dominican Republic, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Dominican Republic, 2015 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2015 25
2016 25 +0.0%
2017 25 +0.0%
2018 25 +0.0%
2019 36.11 +44.4%

Countries ranked near Dominican Republic

  1. 131 Benin 36.11 compare
  2. 131 Ecuador 36.11 compare
  3. 131 Ghana 36.11 compare
  4. 131 Haiti 36.11 compare
  5. 131 Lebanon 36.11 compare
  6. 131 Nicaragua 36.11 compare
  7. 131 Senegal 36.11 compare
  8. 131 Seychelles 36.11 compare
  9. 131 Tajikistan 36.11 compare
  10. 131 Tunisia 36.11 compare
  11. 131 Vanuatu 36.11 compare
  12. 131 Zambia 36.11 compare
  13. 131 Zimbabwe 36.11 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Dominican Republic

All data for Dominican Republic →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Dominican Republic?
Enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Dominican Republic was 36.11 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) recorded in Dominican Republic?
The highest recorded value was 36.11 in 2019.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) recorded in Dominican Republic?
The lowest recorded value was 25 in 2015.
How does Dominican Republic rank for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
Dominican Republic ranks 131st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Dominican Republic data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Dominican Republic. Statizoid. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/dominican-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/dominican-republic/">Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Dominican Republic</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.