Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Pakistan

Pakistan: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) was 31.39 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
31.39
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
150th
of 191 countries
All-time high
31.39
in 2015
All-time low
31.39
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Pakistan, 2015–2019

01020302015201720192015: 31.42016: 31.42017: 31.42018: 31.42019: 31.4

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Pakistan is 31.39, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over five years.

That places Pakistan 150th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Pakistan, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Pakistan, 2015 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2015 31.39
2016 31.39 +0.0%
2017 31.39 +0.0%
2018 31.39 +0.0%
2019 31.39 +0.0%

Countries ranked near Pakistan

  1. 151 Algeria 30.56 compare
  2. 151 Angola 30.56 compare
  3. 151 Central African Republic 30.56 compare
  4. 151 Comoros 30.56 compare
  5. 151 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 30.56 compare
  6. 151 Djibouti 30.56 compare
  7. 151 Maldives 30.56 compare
  8. 151 Mongolia 30.56 compare
  9. 151 Samoa 30.56 compare
  10. 151 San Marino 30.56 compare
  11. 151 Togo 30.56 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Pakistan

All data for Pakistan →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Pakistan?
Enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Pakistan was 31.39 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) recorded in Pakistan?
The highest recorded value was 31.39 in 2015.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) recorded in Pakistan?
The lowest recorded value was 31.39 in 2015.
How does Pakistan rank for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
Pakistan ranks 150th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Pakistan data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Pakistan. Statizoid. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/pakistan/">Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Pakistan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.