Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in San Marino

San Marino: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) was 30.56 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
30.56
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
151st
of 191 countries
All-time high
30.56
in 2015
All-time low
30.56
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in San Marino, 2015–2019

01020302015201720192015: 30.62016: 30.62017: 30.62018: 30.62019: 30.6

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

San Marino recorded 30.56 for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over five years.

San Marino ranks 151st of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in San Marino, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in San Marino, 2015 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2015 30.56
2016 30.56 +0.0%
2017 30.56 +0.0%
2018 30.56 +0.0%
2019 30.56 +0.0%

Countries ranked near San Marino

  1. 150 Pakistan 31.39 compare
  2. 151 Algeria 30.56 compare
  3. 151 Angola 30.56 compare
  4. 151 Central African Republic 30.56 compare
  5. 151 Comoros 30.56 compare
  6. 151 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 30.56 compare
  7. 151 Djibouti 30.56 compare
  8. 151 Maldives 30.56 compare
  9. 151 Mongolia 30.56 compare
  10. 151 Samoa 30.56 compare
  11. 151 Togo 30.56 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for San Marino

All data for San Marino →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in San Marino?
Enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in San Marino was 30.56 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) recorded in San Marino?
The highest recorded value was 30.56 in 2015.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) recorded in San Marino?
The lowest recorded value was 30.56 in 2015.
How does San Marino rank for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
San Marino ranks 151st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this San Marino data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in San Marino. Statizoid. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/san-marino/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/san-marino/">Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in San Marino</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.