Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Albania

Albania: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) was 41.67 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
41.67
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
109th
of 191 countries
All-time high
41.67
in 2018
All-time low
33.33
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Albania, 2015–2019

0102030402015201720192015: 33.32016: 33.32017: 33.32018: 41.72019: 41.7

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Albania stood at 41.67. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

The figure is up 25.0% over five years.

That places Albania 109th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Albania, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Albania, 2015 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2015 33.33
2016 33.33 +0.0%
2017 33.33 +0.0%
2018 41.67 +25.0%
2019 41.67 +0.0%

Countries ranked near Albania

  1. 109 Bangladesh 41.67 compare
  2. 109 Japan 41.67 compare
  3. 109 Belarus 41.67 compare
  4. 109 Burkina Faso 41.67 compare
  5. 109 Cape Verde 41.67 compare
  6. 109 Eswatini 41.67 compare
  7. 109 Fiji 41.67 compare
  8. 109 Guyana 41.67 compare
  9. 109 Honduras 41.67 compare
  10. 109 Iceland 41.67 compare
  11. 109 Kuwait 41.67 compare
  12. 109 Liberia 41.67 compare
  13. 109 Oman 41.67 compare
  14. 109 Philippines 41.67 compare
  15. 109 Viet Nam 41.67 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Albania

All data for Albania →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Albania?
Enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Albania was 41.67 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) recorded in Albania?
The highest recorded value was 41.67 in 2018.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) recorded in Albania?
The lowest recorded value was 33.33 in 2015.
How does Albania rank for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
Albania ranks 109th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Albania data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Albania. Statizoid. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/albania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/albania/">Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Albania</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.