Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Hong Kong

Hong Kong: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) was 55.56 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
55.56
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
61st
of 191 countries
All-time high
55.56
in 2015
All-time low
55.56
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Hong Kong, 2015–2019

02040602015201720192015: 55.62016: 55.62017: 55.62018: 55.62019: 55.6

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Hong Kong stood at 55.56. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over five years.

That places Hong Kong 61st out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Hong Kong, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Hong Kong, 2015 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2015 55.56
2016 55.56 +0.0%
2017 55.56 +0.0%
2018 55.56 +0.0%
2019 55.56 +0.0%

Countries ranked near Hong Kong

  1. 60 Mexico 56.08 compare
  2. 61 Chile 55.56 compare
  3. 63 Russia 52.78 compare
  4. 63 Bosnia and Herzegovina 52.78 compare
  5. 63 Costa Rica 52.78 compare
  6. 63 Cote d'Ivoire 52.78 compare
  7. 63 Czechia 52.78 compare
  8. 63 Jamaica 52.78 compare
  9. 63 Malawi 52.78 compare
  10. 63 Morocco 52.78 compare
  11. 63 New Zealand 52.78 compare
  12. 63 Palau 52.78 compare
  13. 63 Peru 52.78 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Hong Kong

All data for Hong Kong →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Hong Kong?
Enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Hong Kong was 55.56 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) recorded in Hong Kong?
The highest recorded value was 55.56 in 2015.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) recorded in Hong Kong?
The lowest recorded value was 55.56 in 2015.
How does Hong Kong rank for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
Hong Kong ranks 61st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Hong Kong data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Hong Kong. Statizoid. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/hong-kong-sar-china/">Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Hong Kong</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.