Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Tanzania, United Republic of

Tanzania, United Republic of: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) was 33.33 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
33.33
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
145th
of 191 countries
All-time high
33.33
in 2015
All-time low
33.33
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Tanzania, United Republic of, 2015–2019

01020302015201720192015: 33.32016: 33.32017: 33.32018: 33.32019: 33.3

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Tanzania, United Republic of stood at 33.33. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over five years.

That places Tanzania, United Republic of 145th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Tanzania, United Republic of, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Tanzania, United Republic of, 2015 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2015 33.33
2016 33.33 +0.0%
2017 33.33 +0.0%
2018 33.33 +0.0%
2019 33.33 +0.0%

Countries ranked near Tanzania, United Republic of

  1. 145 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 33.33 compare
  2. 145 Guatemala 33.33 compare
  3. 145 Kiribati 33.33 compare
  4. 145 Nepal 33.33 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Tanzania, United Republic of

All data for Tanzania, United Republic of →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Tanzania, United Republic of?
Enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Tanzania, United Republic of was 33.33 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) recorded in Tanzania, United Republic of?
The highest recorded value was 33.33 in 2015.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) recorded in Tanzania, United Republic of?
The lowest recorded value was 33.33 in 2015.
How does Tanzania, United Republic of rank for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 145th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Tanzania, United Republic of data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Tanzania, United Republic of. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/tanzania/">Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Tanzania, United Republic of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.