Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Mauritania

Mauritania: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) was 44.44 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
44.44
Change on year
up 60.0%
World rank
93rd
of 190 countries
All-time high
44.44
in 2019
All-time low
22.22
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Mauritania, 2015–2019

0102030402015201720192015: 22.22016: 22.22017: 27.82018: 27.82019: 44.4

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Mauritania is 44.44, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

That represents a change of up 60.0% on the previous year and up 100.0% over five years.

Mauritania ranks 93rd of 190 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Mauritania, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Mauritania, 2015 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2015 22.22
2016 22.22 +0.0%
2017 27.78 +25.0%
2018 27.78 +0.0%
2019 44.44 +60.0%

Countries ranked near Mauritania

  1. 93 Bahamas 44.44 compare
  2. 93 Belgium 44.44 compare
  3. 93 Belize 44.44 compare
  4. 93 Bhutan 44.44 compare
  5. 93 Cyprus 44.44 compare
  6. 93 El Salvador 44.44 compare
  7. 93 Jordan 44.44 compare
  8. 93 Madagascar 44.44 compare
  9. 93 Marshall Islands 44.44 compare
  10. 93 Niger 44.44 compare
  11. 93 Panama 44.44 compare
  12. 93 Sierra Leone 44.44 compare
  13. 93 Trinidad and Tobago 44.44 compare
  14. 93 Uruguay 44.44 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Mauritania

All data for Mauritania →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Mauritania?
Enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Mauritania was 44.44 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) recorded in Mauritania?
The highest recorded value was 44.44 in 2019.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) recorded in Mauritania?
The lowest recorded value was 22.22 in 2015.
How does Mauritania rank for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
Mauritania ranks 93rd out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Mauritania data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Mauritania. Statizoid. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/mauritania/">Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Mauritania</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.