Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Cape Verde

Cape Verde: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) was 41.67 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
41.67
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
108th
of 190 countries
All-time high
41.67
in 2015
All-time low
41.67
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Cape Verde, 2015–2019

0102030402015201720192015: 41.72016: 41.72017: 41.72018: 41.72019: 41.7

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Cape Verde stood at 41.67. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over five years.

Cape Verde ranks 108th of 190 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Cape Verde, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Cape Verde, 2015 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2015 41.67
2016 41.67 +0.0%
2017 41.67 +0.0%
2018 41.67 +0.0%
2019 41.67 +0.0%

Countries ranked near Cape Verde

  1. 108 Bangladesh 41.67 compare
  2. 108 Japan 41.67 compare
  3. 108 Albania 41.67 compare
  4. 108 Belarus 41.67 compare
  5. 108 Burkina Faso 41.67 compare
  6. 108 Eswatini 41.67 compare
  7. 108 Fiji 41.67 compare
  8. 108 Guyana 41.67 compare
  9. 108 Honduras 41.67 compare
  10. 108 Iceland 41.67 compare
  11. 108 Kuwait 41.67 compare
  12. 108 Liberia 41.67 compare
  13. 108 Oman 41.67 compare
  14. 108 Philippines 41.67 compare
  15. 108 Viet Nam 41.67 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Cape Verde

All data for Cape Verde →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Cape Verde?
Enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Cape Verde was 41.67 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) recorded in Cape Verde?
The highest recorded value was 41.67 in 2015.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) recorded in Cape Verde?
The lowest recorded value was 41.67 in 2015.
How does Cape Verde rank for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
Cape Verde ranks 108th out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Cape Verde data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Cape Verde. Statizoid. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/cabo-verde/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/cabo-verde/">Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Cape Verde</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.