Statizoid

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Australia

Australia: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) was 86.11 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
86.11
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
4th
of 190 countries
All-time high
86.11
in 2015
All-time low
86.11
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Australia, 2015–2019

0204060802015201720192015: 86.12016: 86.12017: 86.12018: 86.12019: 86.1

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Australia is 86.11, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over five years.

Australia ranks 4th of 190 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Countries ranked near Australia

  1. 1 China (People’s Republic of) 91.67 compare
  2. 2 Kazakhstan 88.89 compare
  3. 2 Rwanda 88.89 compare
  4. 4 Singapore 86.11 compare
  5. 6 Lithuania 83.33 compare
  6. 6 Türkiye 83.33 compare
  7. 6 United Kingdom 83.33 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Australia

All data for Australia →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Australia?
Enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Australia was 86.11 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) recorded in Australia?
The highest recorded value was 86.11 in 2015.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) recorded in Australia?
The lowest recorded value was 86.11 in 2015.
How does Australia rank for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
Australia ranks 4th out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Australia data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Australia. Statizoid. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/australia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/australia/">Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Australia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.