Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Bhutan

Bhutan: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) was 44.44 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
44.44
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
93rd
of 190 countries
All-time high
44.44
in 2017
All-time low
36.11
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Bhutan, 2015–2019

0102030402015201720192015: 36.12016: 36.12017: 44.42018: 44.42019: 44.4

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Bhutan is 44.44, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 23.1% over five years.

That places Bhutan 93rd out of 190 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Bhutan, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Bhutan, 2015 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2015 36.11
2016 36.11 +0.0%
2017 44.44 +23.1%
2018 44.44 +0.0%
2019 44.44 +0.0%

Countries ranked near Bhutan

  1. 93 Bahamas 44.44 compare
  2. 93 Belgium 44.44 compare
  3. 93 Belize 44.44 compare
  4. 93 Cyprus 44.44 compare
  5. 93 El Salvador 44.44 compare
  6. 93 Jordan 44.44 compare
  7. 93 Madagascar 44.44 compare
  8. 93 Marshall Islands 44.44 compare
  9. 93 Mauritania 44.44 compare
  10. 93 Niger 44.44 compare
  11. 93 Panama 44.44 compare
  12. 93 Sierra Leone 44.44 compare
  13. 93 Trinidad and Tobago 44.44 compare
  14. 93 Uruguay 44.44 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Bhutan

All data for Bhutan →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Bhutan?
Enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Bhutan was 44.44 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) recorded in Bhutan?
The highest recorded value was 44.44 in 2017.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) recorded in Bhutan?
The lowest recorded value was 36.11 in 2015.
How does Bhutan rank for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
Bhutan ranks 93rd out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Bhutan data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Bhutan. Statizoid. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/bhutan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/bhutan/">Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Bhutan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.