Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Sierra Leone

Sierra Leone: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) was 44.44 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
44.44
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
94th
of 191 countries
All-time high
44.44
in 2015
All-time low
44.44
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Sierra Leone, 2015–2019

0102030402015201720192015: 44.42016: 44.42017: 44.42018: 44.42019: 44.4

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Sierra Leone recorded 44.44 for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over five years.

Sierra Leone ranks 94th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Sierra Leone, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Sierra Leone, 2015 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2015 44.44
2016 44.44 +0.0%
2017 44.44 +0.0%
2018 44.44 +0.0%
2019 44.44 +0.0%

Countries ranked near Sierra Leone

  1. 94 Bahamas 44.44 compare
  2. 94 Belgium 44.44 compare
  3. 94 Belize 44.44 compare
  4. 94 Bhutan 44.44 compare
  5. 94 Cyprus 44.44 compare
  6. 94 El Salvador 44.44 compare
  7. 94 Jordan 44.44 compare
  8. 94 Madagascar 44.44 compare
  9. 94 Marshall Islands 44.44 compare
  10. 94 Mauritania 44.44 compare
  11. 94 Niger 44.44 compare
  12. 94 Panama 44.44 compare
  13. 94 Trinidad and Tobago 44.44 compare
  14. 94 Uruguay 44.44 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Sierra Leone

All data for Sierra Leone →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Sierra Leone?
Enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Sierra Leone was 44.44 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) recorded in Sierra Leone?
The highest recorded value was 44.44 in 2015.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) recorded in Sierra Leone?
The lowest recorded value was 44.44 in 2015.
How does Sierra Leone rank for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
Sierra Leone ranks 94th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Sierra Leone data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Sierra Leone. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/sierra-leone/">Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Sierra Leone</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.