Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Slovenia

Slovenia: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) was 63.89 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
63.89
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
36th
of 191 countries
All-time high
63.89
in 2018
All-time low
58.33
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Slovenia, 2015–2019

02040602015201720192015: 58.32016: 58.32017: 58.32018: 63.92019: 63.9

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Slovenia recorded 63.89 for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 9.5% over five years.

That places Slovenia 36th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Slovenia, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Slovenia, 2015 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2015 58.33
2016 58.33 +0.0%
2017 58.33 +0.0%
2018 63.89 +9.5%
2019 63.89 +0.0%

Countries ranked near Slovenia

  1. 33 France 66.67 compare
  2. 33 Georgia 66.67 compare
  3. 33 Sweden 66.67 compare
  4. 36 Antigua and Barbuda 63.89 compare
  5. 36 Armenia 63.89 compare
  6. 36 Brunei Darussalam 63.89 compare
  7. 36 Dominica 63.89 compare
  8. 36 Montenegro 63.89 compare
  9. 36 Saudi Arabia 63.89 compare
  10. 36 Spain 63.89 compare
  11. 36 Saint Kitts and Nevis 63.89 compare
  12. 36 Saint Lucia 63.89 compare
  13. 36 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 63.89 compare
  14. 36 Ukraine 63.89 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Slovenia

All data for Slovenia →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Slovenia?
Enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Slovenia was 63.89 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) recorded in Slovenia?
The highest recorded value was 63.89 in 2018.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) recorded in Slovenia?
The lowest recorded value was 58.33 in 2015.
How does Slovenia rank for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
Slovenia ranks 36th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Slovenia data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Slovenia. Statizoid. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/slovenia/">Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Slovenia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.