Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in New Zealand

New Zealand: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) was 52.78 in 2019. ▼ Falling

Latest (2019)
52.78
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
63rd
of 191 countries
All-time high
61.11
in 2015
All-time low
52.78
in 2017
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in New Zealand, 2015–2019

02040602015201720192015: 61.12016: 61.12017: 52.82018: 52.82019: 52.8

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in New Zealand stood at 52.78. That is the lowest value across all 5 years on record.

That represents a change of down 13.6% over five years.

New Zealand ranks 63rd of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in New Zealand, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in New Zealand, 2015 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2015 61.11
2016 61.11 +0.0%
2017 52.78 -13.6%
2018 52.78 +0.0%
2019 52.78 +0.0%

Countries ranked near New Zealand

  1. 60 Mexico 56.08 compare
  2. 61 Chile 55.56 compare
  3. 61 Hong Kong 55.56 compare
  4. 63 Russia 52.78 compare
  5. 63 Bosnia and Herzegovina 52.78 compare
  6. 63 Costa Rica 52.78 compare
  7. 63 Cote d'Ivoire 52.78 compare
  8. 63 Czechia 52.78 compare
  9. 63 Jamaica 52.78 compare
  10. 63 Malawi 52.78 compare
  11. 63 Morocco 52.78 compare
  12. 63 Palau 52.78 compare
  13. 63 Peru 52.78 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for New Zealand

All data for New Zealand →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in New Zealand?
Enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in New Zealand was 52.78 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) recorded in New Zealand?
The highest recorded value was 61.11 in 2015.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) recorded in New Zealand?
The lowest recorded value was 52.78 in 2017.
How does New Zealand rank for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
New Zealand ranks 63rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this New Zealand data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in New Zealand. Statizoid. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/new-zealand/">Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in New Zealand</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.