Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Lao People's Democratic Republic

Lao People's Democratic Republic: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) was 19.44 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
19.44
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
184th
of 190 countries
All-time high
19.44
in 2015
All-time low
19.44
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Lao People's Democratic Republic, 2015–2019

051015202015201720192015: 19.42016: 19.42017: 19.42018: 19.42019: 19.4

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Lao People's Democratic Republic stood at 19.44. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over five years.

That places Lao People's Democratic Republic 184th out of 190 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Lao People's Democratic Republic, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Lao People's Democratic Republic, 2015 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2015 19.44
2016 19.44 +0.0%
2017 19.44 +0.0%
2018 19.44 +0.0%
2019 19.44 +0.0%

Countries ranked near Lao People's Democratic Republic

  1. 184 Equatorial Guinea 19.44 compare
  2. 184 South Sudan 19.44 compare
  3. 184 Suriname 19.44 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Lao People's Democratic Republic

All data for Lao People's Democratic Republic →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Lao People's Democratic Republic?
Enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Lao People's Democratic Republic was 19.44 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) recorded in Lao People's Democratic Republic?
The highest recorded value was 19.44 in 2015.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) recorded in Lao People's Democratic Republic?
The lowest recorded value was 19.44 in 2015.
How does Lao People's Democratic Republic rank for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 184th out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Lao People's Democratic Republic data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Lao People's Democratic Republic. Statizoid. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/lao-pdr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/lao-pdr/">Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) in Lao People's Democratic Republic</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.