Georgia vs Mongolia: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Georgia
3
in 2018
Mongolia
3
in 2018
Georgia rank
1st
Mongolia rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Georgia
  • Mongolia
0123180019092018

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 3 against 3 in Mongolia, a difference of 0.

Across all 92 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.

Georgia ranks 1st and Mongolia ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 10 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Mongolia Difference Ahead
1920s 1 1 0 β€”
1930s 1 1 0 β€”
1940s 1 1 0 β€”
1950s 1 1 0 β€”
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 2 2.71 0.7143 Mongolia
2000s 2.3 3 0.7 Mongolia
2010s 3 3 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Georgia or Mongolia?
Georgia, at 3 against 3 in Mongolia as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Georgia and Mongolia?
0, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Mongolia?
92 years are reported by both, from 1924 to 2018.
How do Georgia and Mongolia rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Georgia ranks 1st and Mongolia ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).