Georgia vs Germany: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Georgia
3
in 2018
Germany
3
in 2018
Georgia rank
1st
Germany rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Georgia
  • Germany
0123180019092018

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 3 against 3 in Germany, a difference of 0.

Across all 98 years both countries report, Germany has been ahead every year.

Georgia ranks 1st and Germany ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Germany Difference Ahead
1870s 1 1 0 β€”
1880s 1 1 0 β€”
1890s 1 1 0 β€”
1900s 1 1 0 β€”
1910s 0.7778 1.22 0.4444 Germany
1920s 0.8 3 2.2 Germany
1930s 1 1.6 0.6 Germany
1940s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 2 3 1 Germany
2000s 2.3 3 0.7 Germany
2010s 3 3 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Georgia or Germany?
Georgia, at 3 against 3 in Germany as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Georgia and Germany?
0, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Germany?
98 years are reported by both, from 1871 to 2018.
How do Georgia and Germany rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Georgia ranks 1st and Germany ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).