Bolivia vs Germany: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Bolivia
3
in 2018
Germany
3
in 2018
Bolivia rank
1st
Germany rank
1st
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Bolivia
- Germany
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports 3 against 3 in Germany, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 101 shared years of data; in 1871 it was Germany ahead.
Bolivia ranks 1st and Germany ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 4 and Germany in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Germany | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1870s | 0.75 | 1 | 0.25 | Germany |
| 1880s | 2 | 1 | 1 | Bolivia |
| 1890s | 2 | 1 | 1 | Bolivia |
| 1900s | 2 | 1 | 1 | Bolivia |
| 1910s | 2 | 1.22 | 0.7778 | Bolivia |
| 1920s | 2 | 3 | 1 | Germany |
| 1930s | 1.6 | 1.6 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Bolivia or Germany?
- Bolivia, at 3 against 3 in Germany as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Bolivia and Germany?
- 0, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Germany?
- 101 years are reported by both, from 1871 to 2018.
- How do Bolivia and Germany rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Bolivia ranks 1st and Germany ranks 1st of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).