Bolivia vs South Korea: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Bolivia
3
in 2018
South Korea
3
in 2018
Bolivia rank
1st
South Korea rank
1st
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Bolivia
- South Korea
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports 3 against 3 in South Korea, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 70 shared years of data; in 1948 it was South Korea ahead.
Bolivia ranks 1st and South Korea ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 3 and South Korea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 1.8 | 1 | 0.8 | Bolivia |
| 1960s | 0.8 | 2.4 | 1.6 | South Korea |
| 1970s | 0 | 1.4 | 1.4 | South Korea |
| 1980s | 2 | 1.22 | 0.7778 | Bolivia |
| 1990s | 3 | 2.2 | 0.8 | Bolivia |
| 2000s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Bolivia or South Korea?
- Bolivia, at 3 against 3 in South Korea as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Bolivia and South Korea?
- 0, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and South Korea?
- 70 years are reported by both, from 1948 to 2018.
- How do Bolivia and South Korea rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Bolivia ranks 1st and South Korea ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).