Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Philippines
Philippines: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program was 0.0% in 2018. ▬ Flat
Latest (2018)
0.0%
World rank
68th
of 174 countries
All-time high
0.0%
in 1998
All-time low
0.0%
in 1998
Years of data
17
1998–2018
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Philippines, 1998–2018
Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Measured in %.
Analysis
Philippines recorded 0.0% for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in 2018. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.
Over the whole period, gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Philippines peaked at 0.0% in 1998 and was at its lowest, 0.0%, in 1998.
That places Philippines 68th out of 174 countries with data for 2018, putting it in the middle of the range.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 5 |
Countries ranked near Philippines
- 65 Guatemala 1.4% compare
- 66 Rwanda 0.6% compare
- 67 Turkey 0.3% compare
- 68 Afghanistan 0.0% compare
- 68 Albania 0.0% compare
- 68 Algeria 0.0% compare
- 68 Andorra 0.0% compare
- 68 Armenia 0.0% compare
- 68 Aruba 0.0% compare
- 68 Bahamas 0.0% compare
- 68 Bangladesh 0.0% compare
- 68 Barbados 0.0% compare
- 68 Belize 0.0% compare
- 68 Benin 0.0% compare
- 68 Bermuda 0.0% compare
- 68 Bhutan 0.0% compare
- 68 Bolivia 0.0% compare
- 68 Botswana 0.0% compare
- 68 Brunei 0.0% compare
- 68 Bulgaria 0.0% compare
- 68 Burkina Faso 0.0% compare
- 68 Burundi 0.0% compare
- 68 Cape Verde 0.0% compare
- 68 Cameroon 0.0% compare
- 68 Central African Republic 0.0% compare
- 68 Chad 0.0% compare
- 68 China 0.0% compare
- 68 Colombia 0.0% compare
- 68 Democratic Republic of Congo 0.0% compare
- 68 Congo 0.0% compare
- 68 Cote d'Ivoire 0.0% compare
- 68 Czechia 0.0% compare
- 68 Djibouti 0.0% compare
- 68 Dominican Republic 0.0% compare
- 68 Ecuador 0.0% compare
- 68 Egypt 0.0% compare
- 68 Eritrea 0.0% compare
- 68 Eswatini 0.0% compare
- 68 Ethiopia 0.0% compare
- 68 Fiji 0.0% compare
- 68 France 0.0% compare
- 68 Georgia 0.0% compare
- 68 Greece 0.0% compare
- 68 Guinea 0.0% compare
- 68 Guyana 0.0% compare
- 68 Honduras 0.0% compare
- 68 Hong Kong 0.0% compare
- 68 India 0.0% compare
- 68 Iran 0.0% compare
- 68 Italy 0.0% compare
- 68 Japan 0.0% compare
- 68 Jordan 0.0% compare
- 68 Kenya 0.0% compare
- 68 Kuwait 0.0% compare
- 68 Lebanon 0.0% compare
- 68 Lesotho 0.0% compare
- 68 Liberia 0.0% compare
- 68 Liechtenstein 0.0% compare
- 68 Luxembourg 0.0% compare
- 68 Macao 0.0% compare
- 68 Madagascar 0.0% compare
- 68 Malawi 0.0% compare
- 68 Malaysia 0.0% compare
- 68 Maldives 0.0% compare
- 68 Mali 0.0% compare
- 68 Malta 0.0% compare
- 68 Marshall Islands 0.0% compare
- 68 Monaco 0.0% compare
- 68 Mongolia 0.0% compare
- 68 Mozambique 0.0% compare
- 68 Nauru 0.0% compare
- 68 Nepal 0.0% compare
- 68 Netherlands 0.0% compare
- 68 Niger 0.0% compare
- 68 Oman 0.0% compare
- 68 Pakistan 0.0% compare
- 68 Palau 0.0% compare
- 68 Papua New Guinea 0.0% compare
- 68 Poland 0.0% compare
- 68 Portugal 0.0% compare
- 68 Samoa 0.0% compare
- 68 Saudi Arabia 0.0% compare
- 68 Senegal 0.0% compare
- 68 Seychelles 0.0% compare
- 68 Sierra Leone 0.0% compare
- 68 Slovakia 0.0% compare
- 68 Solomon Islands 0.0% compare
- 68 Sri Lanka 0.0% compare
- 68 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0.0% compare
- 68 Sudan 0.0% compare
- 68 Suriname 0.0% compare
- 68 Switzerland 0.0% compare
- 68 Syria 0.0% compare
- 68 Tajikistan 0.0% compare
- 68 Tanzania 0.0% compare
- 68 East Timor 0.0% compare
- 68 Togo 0.0% compare
- 68 Tonga 0.0% compare
- 68 Trinidad and Tobago 0.0% compare
- 68 Tunisia 0.0% compare
- 68 Turks and Caicos Islands 0.0% compare
- 68 Tuvalu 0.0% compare
- 68 Uganda 0.0% compare
- 68 Ukraine 0.0% compare
- 68 Uzbekistan 0.0% compare
- 68 Vanuatu 0.0% compare
- 68 Palestine 0.0% compare
- 68 Zambia 0.0% compare
- 68 Zimbabwe 0.0% compare
More reference data data for Philippines
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.21 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 12.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.43 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 12.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 7.4 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 10.7 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 15.23 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 67.05 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 7.76 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Philippines?
- Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Philippines was 0.0% in 2018, according to UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
- What is the highest gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program recorded in Philippines?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0% in 1998.
- What is the lowest gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program recorded in Philippines?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0% in 1998.
- How does Philippines rank for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Philippines ranks 68th out of 174 countries with data for 2018.
- Where does this Philippines data come from?
- The figures come from UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as part of Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, female (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total female enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.