Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Bolivia
Bolivia: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program was 0.0% in 2018. ▬ Flat
Latest (2018)
0.0%
World rank
68th
of 174 countries
All-time high
0.0%
in 1998
All-time low
0.0%
in 1998
Years of data
21
1998–2018
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Bolivia, 1998–2018
Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Measured in %.
Analysis
In 2018, gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Bolivia stood at 0.0%. That is the highest value across all 21 years on record.
Over the whole period, gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Bolivia peaked at 0.0% in 1998 and was at its lowest, 0.0%, in 1998.
That places Bolivia 68th out of 174 countries with data for 2018, putting it in the middle of the range.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 9 |
Countries ranked near Bolivia
- 65 Guatemala 1.4% compare
- 66 Rwanda 0.6% compare
- 67 Turkey 0.3% compare
- 68 Afghanistan 0.0% compare
- 68 Albania 0.0% compare
- 68 Algeria 0.0% compare
- 68 Andorra 0.0% compare
- 68 Armenia 0.0% compare
- 68 Aruba 0.0% compare
- 68 Bahamas 0.0% compare
- 68 Bangladesh 0.0% compare
- 68 Barbados 0.0% compare
- 68 Belize 0.0% compare
- 68 Benin 0.0% compare
- 68 Bermuda 0.0% compare
- 68 Bhutan 0.0% compare
- 68 Botswana 0.0% compare
- 68 Brunei 0.0% compare
- 68 Bulgaria 0.0% compare
- 68 Burkina Faso 0.0% compare
- 68 Burundi 0.0% compare
- 68 Cape Verde 0.0% compare
- 68 Cameroon 0.0% compare
- 68 Central African Republic 0.0% compare
- 68 Chad 0.0% compare
- 68 China 0.0% compare
- 68 Colombia 0.0% compare
- 68 Democratic Republic of Congo 0.0% compare
- 68 Congo 0.0% compare
- 68 Cote d'Ivoire 0.0% compare
- 68 Czechia 0.0% compare
- 68 Djibouti 0.0% compare
- 68 Dominican Republic 0.0% compare
- 68 Ecuador 0.0% compare
- 68 Egypt 0.0% compare
- 68 Eritrea 0.0% compare
- 68 Eswatini 0.0% compare
- 68 Ethiopia 0.0% compare
- 68 Fiji 0.0% compare
- 68 France 0.0% compare
- 68 Georgia 0.0% compare
- 68 Greece 0.0% compare
- 68 Guinea 0.0% compare
- 68 Guyana 0.0% compare
- 68 Honduras 0.0% compare
- 68 Hong Kong 0.0% compare
- 68 India 0.0% compare
- 68 Iran 0.0% compare
- 68 Italy 0.0% compare
- 68 Japan 0.0% compare
- 68 Jordan 0.0% compare
- 68 Kenya 0.0% compare
- 68 Kuwait 0.0% compare
- 68 Lebanon 0.0% compare
- 68 Lesotho 0.0% compare
- 68 Liberia 0.0% compare
- 68 Liechtenstein 0.0% compare
- 68 Luxembourg 0.0% compare
- 68 Macao 0.0% compare
- 68 Madagascar 0.0% compare
- 68 Malawi 0.0% compare
- 68 Malaysia 0.0% compare
- 68 Maldives 0.0% compare
- 68 Mali 0.0% compare
- 68 Malta 0.0% compare
- 68 Marshall Islands 0.0% compare
- 68 Monaco 0.0% compare
- 68 Mongolia 0.0% compare
- 68 Mozambique 0.0% compare
- 68 Nauru 0.0% compare
- 68 Nepal 0.0% compare
- 68 Netherlands 0.0% compare
- 68 Niger 0.0% compare
- 68 Oman 0.0% compare
- 68 Pakistan 0.0% compare
- 68 Palau 0.0% compare
- 68 Papua New Guinea 0.0% compare
- 68 Philippines 0.0% compare
- 68 Poland 0.0% compare
- 68 Portugal 0.0% compare
- 68 Samoa 0.0% compare
- 68 Saudi Arabia 0.0% compare
- 68 Senegal 0.0% compare
- 68 Seychelles 0.0% compare
- 68 Sierra Leone 0.0% compare
- 68 Slovakia 0.0% compare
- 68 Solomon Islands 0.0% compare
- 68 Sri Lanka 0.0% compare
- 68 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0.0% compare
- 68 Sudan 0.0% compare
- 68 Suriname 0.0% compare
- 68 Switzerland 0.0% compare
- 68 Syria 0.0% compare
- 68 Tajikistan 0.0% compare
- 68 Tanzania 0.0% compare
- 68 East Timor 0.0% compare
- 68 Togo 0.0% compare
- 68 Tonga 0.0% compare
- 68 Trinidad and Tobago 0.0% compare
- 68 Tunisia 0.0% compare
- 68 Turks and Caicos Islands 0.0% compare
- 68 Tuvalu 0.0% compare
- 68 Uganda 0.0% compare
- 68 Ukraine 0.0% compare
- 68 Uzbekistan 0.0% compare
- 68 Vanuatu 0.0% compare
- 68 Palestine 0.0% compare
- 68 Zambia 0.0% compare
- 68 Zimbabwe 0.0% compare
More reference data data for Bolivia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.7329 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 3.91 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.22 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3892 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.22 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.46 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.33 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 18.39 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 25.12 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.12 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Bolivia?
- Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Bolivia was 0.0% in 2018, according to UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
- What is the highest gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program recorded in Bolivia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0% in 1998.
- What is the lowest gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program recorded in Bolivia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0% in 1998.
- How does Bolivia rank for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Bolivia ranks 68th out of 174 countries with data for 2018.
- Where does this Bolivia data come from?
- The figures come from UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as part of Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, female (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total female enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.