Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in China
China: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program was 0.0% in 2019. ▬ Flat
Latest (2019)
0.0%
World rank
68th
of 174 countries
All-time high
0.0%
in 1999
All-time low
0.0%
in 1999
Years of data
19
1999–2019
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in China, 1999–2019
Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Measured in %.
Analysis
China recorded 0.0% for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in 2019. That is the highest value across all 19 years on record.
Over the whole period, gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in China peaked at 0.0% in 1999 and was at its lowest, 0.0%, in 1999.
That places China 68th out of 174 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1 |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 8 |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 10 |
Countries ranked near China
- 65 Guatemala 1.4% compare
- 66 Rwanda 0.6% compare
- 67 Turkey 0.3% compare
- 68 Afghanistan 0.0% compare
- 68 Albania 0.0% compare
- 68 Algeria 0.0% compare
- 68 Andorra 0.0% compare
- 68 Armenia 0.0% compare
- 68 Aruba 0.0% compare
- 68 Bahamas 0.0% compare
- 68 Bangladesh 0.0% compare
- 68 Barbados 0.0% compare
- 68 Belize 0.0% compare
- 68 Benin 0.0% compare
- 68 Bermuda 0.0% compare
- 68 Bhutan 0.0% compare
- 68 Bolivia 0.0% compare
- 68 Botswana 0.0% compare
- 68 Brunei 0.0% compare
- 68 Bulgaria 0.0% compare
- 68 Burkina Faso 0.0% compare
- 68 Burundi 0.0% compare
- 68 Cape Verde 0.0% compare
- 68 Cameroon 0.0% compare
- 68 Central African Republic 0.0% compare
- 68 Chad 0.0% compare
- 68 Colombia 0.0% compare
- 68 Democratic Republic of Congo 0.0% compare
- 68 Congo 0.0% compare
- 68 Cote d'Ivoire 0.0% compare
- 68 Czechia 0.0% compare
- 68 Djibouti 0.0% compare
- 68 Dominican Republic 0.0% compare
- 68 Ecuador 0.0% compare
- 68 Egypt 0.0% compare
- 68 Eritrea 0.0% compare
- 68 Eswatini 0.0% compare
- 68 Ethiopia 0.0% compare
- 68 Fiji 0.0% compare
- 68 France 0.0% compare
- 68 Georgia 0.0% compare
- 68 Greece 0.0% compare
- 68 Guinea 0.0% compare
- 68 Guyana 0.0% compare
- 68 Honduras 0.0% compare
- 68 Hong Kong 0.0% compare
- 68 India 0.0% compare
- 68 Iran 0.0% compare
- 68 Italy 0.0% compare
- 68 Japan 0.0% compare
- 68 Jordan 0.0% compare
- 68 Kenya 0.0% compare
- 68 Kuwait 0.0% compare
- 68 Lebanon 0.0% compare
- 68 Lesotho 0.0% compare
- 68 Liberia 0.0% compare
- 68 Liechtenstein 0.0% compare
- 68 Luxembourg 0.0% compare
- 68 Macao 0.0% compare
- 68 Madagascar 0.0% compare
- 68 Malawi 0.0% compare
- 68 Malaysia 0.0% compare
- 68 Maldives 0.0% compare
- 68 Mali 0.0% compare
- 68 Malta 0.0% compare
- 68 Marshall Islands 0.0% compare
- 68 Monaco 0.0% compare
- 68 Mongolia 0.0% compare
- 68 Mozambique 0.0% compare
- 68 Nauru 0.0% compare
- 68 Nepal 0.0% compare
- 68 Netherlands 0.0% compare
- 68 Niger 0.0% compare
- 68 Oman 0.0% compare
- 68 Pakistan 0.0% compare
- 68 Palau 0.0% compare
- 68 Papua New Guinea 0.0% compare
- 68 Philippines 0.0% compare
- 68 Poland 0.0% compare
- 68 Portugal 0.0% compare
- 68 Samoa 0.0% compare
- 68 Saudi Arabia 0.0% compare
- 68 Senegal 0.0% compare
- 68 Seychelles 0.0% compare
- 68 Sierra Leone 0.0% compare
- 68 Slovakia 0.0% compare
- 68 Solomon Islands 0.0% compare
- 68 Sri Lanka 0.0% compare
- 68 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0.0% compare
- 68 Sudan 0.0% compare
- 68 Suriname 0.0% compare
- 68 Switzerland 0.0% compare
- 68 Syria 0.0% compare
- 68 Tajikistan 0.0% compare
- 68 Tanzania 0.0% compare
- 68 East Timor 0.0% compare
- 68 Togo 0.0% compare
- 68 Tonga 0.0% compare
- 68 Trinidad and Tobago 0.0% compare
- 68 Tunisia 0.0% compare
- 68 Turks and Caicos Islands 0.0% compare
- 68 Tuvalu 0.0% compare
- 68 Uganda 0.0% compare
- 68 Ukraine 0.0% compare
- 68 Uzbekistan 0.0% compare
- 68 Vanuatu 0.0% compare
- 68 Palestine 0.0% compare
- 68 Zambia 0.0% compare
- 68 Zimbabwe 0.0% compare
More reference data data for China
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 350.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 1,546 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 92,945 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1,480 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 54,644 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 303.29 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 18.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 303.29 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 392,076 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 43,889 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in China?
- Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in China was 0.0% in 2019, according to UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
- What is the highest gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program recorded in China?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0% in 1999.
- What is the lowest gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program recorded in China?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0% in 1999.
- How does China rank for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- China ranks 68th out of 174 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this China data come from?
- The figures come from UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as part of Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, female (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 19 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total female enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.