Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Poland
Poland: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program was 0.0% in 2018. ▬ Flat
Latest (2018)
0.0%
World rank
68th
of 174 countries
All-time high
0.0%
in 1998
All-time low
0.0%
in 1998
Years of data
21
1998–2018
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Poland, 1998–2018
Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Measured in %.
Analysis
Poland recorded 0.0% for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in 2018. That is the highest value across all 21 years on record.
Over the whole period, gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Poland peaked at 0.0% in 1998 and was at its lowest, 0.0%, in 1998.
That places Poland 68th out of 174 countries with data for 2018, putting it in the middle of the range.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 9 |
Countries ranked near Poland
- 65 Guatemala 1.4% compare
- 66 Rwanda 0.6% compare
- 67 Turkey 0.3% compare
- 68 Afghanistan 0.0% compare
- 68 Albania 0.0% compare
- 68 Algeria 0.0% compare
- 68 Andorra 0.0% compare
- 68 Armenia 0.0% compare
- 68 Aruba 0.0% compare
- 68 Bahamas 0.0% compare
- 68 Bangladesh 0.0% compare
- 68 Barbados 0.0% compare
- 68 Belize 0.0% compare
- 68 Benin 0.0% compare
- 68 Bermuda 0.0% compare
- 68 Bhutan 0.0% compare
- 68 Bolivia 0.0% compare
- 68 Botswana 0.0% compare
- 68 Brunei 0.0% compare
- 68 Bulgaria 0.0% compare
- 68 Burkina Faso 0.0% compare
- 68 Burundi 0.0% compare
- 68 Cape Verde 0.0% compare
- 68 Cameroon 0.0% compare
- 68 Central African Republic 0.0% compare
- 68 Chad 0.0% compare
- 68 China 0.0% compare
- 68 Colombia 0.0% compare
- 68 Democratic Republic of Congo 0.0% compare
- 68 Congo 0.0% compare
- 68 Cote d'Ivoire 0.0% compare
- 68 Czechia 0.0% compare
- 68 Djibouti 0.0% compare
- 68 Dominican Republic 0.0% compare
- 68 Ecuador 0.0% compare
- 68 Egypt 0.0% compare
- 68 Eritrea 0.0% compare
- 68 Eswatini 0.0% compare
- 68 Ethiopia 0.0% compare
- 68 Fiji 0.0% compare
- 68 France 0.0% compare
- 68 Georgia 0.0% compare
- 68 Greece 0.0% compare
- 68 Guinea 0.0% compare
- 68 Guyana 0.0% compare
- 68 Honduras 0.0% compare
- 68 Hong Kong 0.0% compare
- 68 India 0.0% compare
- 68 Iran 0.0% compare
- 68 Italy 0.0% compare
- 68 Japan 0.0% compare
- 68 Jordan 0.0% compare
- 68 Kenya 0.0% compare
- 68 Kuwait 0.0% compare
- 68 Lebanon 0.0% compare
- 68 Lesotho 0.0% compare
- 68 Liberia 0.0% compare
- 68 Liechtenstein 0.0% compare
- 68 Luxembourg 0.0% compare
- 68 Macao 0.0% compare
- 68 Madagascar 0.0% compare
- 68 Malawi 0.0% compare
- 68 Malaysia 0.0% compare
- 68 Maldives 0.0% compare
- 68 Mali 0.0% compare
- 68 Malta 0.0% compare
- 68 Marshall Islands 0.0% compare
- 68 Monaco 0.0% compare
- 68 Mongolia 0.0% compare
- 68 Mozambique 0.0% compare
- 68 Nauru 0.0% compare
- 68 Nepal 0.0% compare
- 68 Netherlands 0.0% compare
- 68 Niger 0.0% compare
- 68 Oman 0.0% compare
- 68 Pakistan 0.0% compare
- 68 Palau 0.0% compare
- 68 Papua New Guinea 0.0% compare
- 68 Philippines 0.0% compare
- 68 Portugal 0.0% compare
- 68 Samoa 0.0% compare
- 68 Saudi Arabia 0.0% compare
- 68 Senegal 0.0% compare
- 68 Seychelles 0.0% compare
- 68 Sierra Leone 0.0% compare
- 68 Slovakia 0.0% compare
- 68 Solomon Islands 0.0% compare
- 68 Sri Lanka 0.0% compare
- 68 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0.0% compare
- 68 Sudan 0.0% compare
- 68 Suriname 0.0% compare
- 68 Switzerland 0.0% compare
- 68 Syria 0.0% compare
- 68 Tajikistan 0.0% compare
- 68 Tanzania 0.0% compare
- 68 East Timor 0.0% compare
- 68 Togo 0.0% compare
- 68 Tonga 0.0% compare
- 68 Trinidad and Tobago 0.0% compare
- 68 Tunisia 0.0% compare
- 68 Turks and Caicos Islands 0.0% compare
- 68 Tuvalu 0.0% compare
- 68 Uganda 0.0% compare
- 68 Ukraine 0.0% compare
- 68 Uzbekistan 0.0% compare
- 68 Vanuatu 0.0% compare
- 68 Palestine 0.0% compare
- 68 Zambia 0.0% compare
- 68 Zimbabwe 0.0% compare
More reference data data for Poland
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.62 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.499 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 9.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.8896 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 9.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 8.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 5.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.57 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 43.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 4.84 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Poland?
- Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Poland was 0.0% in 2018, according to UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
- What is the highest gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0% in 1998.
- What is the lowest gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0% in 1998.
- How does Poland rank for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Poland ranks 68th out of 174 countries with data for 2018.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as part of Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, female (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total female enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.