China vs Congo: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program

China
0.0%
in 2019
Congo
0.0%
in 2012
China rank
68th
Congo rank
68th

Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time

  • China
  • Congo
00.20.40.60.81199920092019

How they compare

China currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Congo, a difference of 0.0%.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.

China ranks 68th and Congo ranks 68th of 174 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Congo Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2000s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2010s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, China or Congo?
China, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Congo as of 2019.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between China and Congo?
0.0%, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Congo?
12 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2012.
How do China and Congo rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
China ranks 68th and Congo ranks 68th of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, female (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 2,961 data points, 1997–2020
Last refreshed

Total female enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.